Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883206›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

Behavioral manifestations in rodent models of autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Alana Castro Panzenhagen, Amanda Cavalcanti, Dirson João Stein, Ligia Lins de Castro, Mailton Vasconcelos, Mariana Boechat Abreu, Roberto Farina Almeida, Leandro José Bertoglio, Ana Paula Herrmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alana Castro PanzenhagenBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Amanda CavalcantiBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Dirson João SteinBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ligia Lins de CastroBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Mailton VasconcelosBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Mariana Boechat AbreuBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Roberto Farina AlmeidaBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Leandro José BertoglioBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Paula HerrmannBrazilian Reproducibility Initiative in preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (BRISA) Collaboration, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ana.herrmann@ufrgs.br.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-0741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition associated with severe social communication, interaction, and sensory processing impairments. Efforts to understand its etiology and pathophysiology are crucial for improving treatment and prevention measures. Preclinical models of ASD are essential for investigating the biological mechanisms and should present translatability potential. We aim to evaluate the consistency of the most commonly used rodent models of ASD in displaying autistic-like behavior through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsThis review will focus on the most frequently used autism models, surveying studies of six genetic (Ube3a, Pten, Nlgn3, Shank3, Mecp2, and Fmr1), three chemically induced (valproic acid (VPA), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C))), and one inbred model (BTBR T+ Itpr3tf/J mouse strain). Two independent reviewers will screen the records. Data extraction of behavioral outcomes and risk of bias evaluation will be performed. We will conduct a meta-analysis whenever at least five studies investigate the same model and behavioral outcome. We will also explore the heterogeneity and publication bias. Network meta-analyses are planned to compare different models. DISCUSSION: By shortening the gap between animal behavior and human endophenotypes or specific clinical symptoms, we expect to help researchers on which rodent models are adequate for research of specific behavioral manifestations of autism, which potentially require a combination of them depending on the research interest. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021226299 .

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1HumansMiceMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicRodentiaSystematic Reviews as TopicFMR1 protein, humanFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Microfilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsShank3 protein, mouseAnimal modelAutismAutism spectrum disorderNetwork meta-analysisProtocolRodent modelSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35883206
PMCPMC9327140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.