Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883185›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2022

An argument for pandemic risk management using a multidisciplinary One Health approach to governance: an Australian case study.

Katie Woolaston, Zoe Nay, Michelle L Baker, Callum Brockett, Mieghan Bruce, Chris Degeling, Joshua Gilbert, Bethany Jackson, Hope Johnson, Alison Peel and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. One Health and Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: A One Health Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Katie WoolastonSchool of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. katie.woolaston@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7652-9347
Zoe NaySchool of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Michelle L BakerCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity Business Unit, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, Australia.
Callum BrockettSchool of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Mieghan BruceBiosecurity and One Health Research Centre, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Chris DegelingAustralian Centre for Health Engagement Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Joshua GilbertWorimi agriculturalist and researcher, Policy Advisor at the Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous Education and Research, University of Technology Sydney, Australia and PhD Candidate at Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia.
Bethany JacksonBiosecurity and One Health Research Centre, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Hope JohnsonSchool of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Alison PeelCentre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Shafi SahibzadaBiosecurity and One Health Research Centre, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Charlotte OskamBiosecurity and One Health Research Centre, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Chad L HewittBiosecurity and One Health Research Centre, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Australia.
Murdoch University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AUGriffith University · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant global impact. However, COVID-19 is just one of several high-impact infectious diseases that emerged from wildlife and are linked to the human relationship with nature. The rate of emergence of new zoonoses (diseases of animal origin) is increasing, driven by human-induced environmental changes that threaten biodiversity on a global scale. This increase is directly linked to environmental drivers including biodiversity loss, climate change and unsustainable resource extraction. Australia is a biodiversity hotspot and is subject to sustained and significant environmental change, increasing the risk of it being a location for pandemic origin. Moreover, the global integration of markets means that consumption trends in Australia contributes to the risk of disease spill-over in our regional neighbours in Asia-Pacific, and beyond. Despite the clear causal link between anthropogenic pressures on the environment and increasing pandemic risks, Australia's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, like most of the world, has centred largely on public health strategies, with a clear focus on reactive management. Yet, the span of expertise and evidence relevant to the governance of pandemic risk management is much wider than public health and epidemiology. It involves animal/wildlife health, biosecurity, conservation sciences, social sciences, behavioural psychology, law, policy and economic analyses to name just a few.The authors are a team of multidisciplinary practitioners and researchers who have worked together to analyse, synthesise, and harmonise the links between pandemic risk management approaches and issues in different disciplines to provide a holistic overview of current practice, and conclude the need for reform in Australia. We discuss the adoption of a comprehensive and interdisciplinary 'One Health' approach to pandemic risk management in Australia. A key goal of the One Health approach is to be proactive in countering threats of emerging infectious diseases and zoonoses through a recognition of the interdependence between human, animal, and environmental health. Developing ways to implement a One Health approach to pandemic prevention would not only reduce the risk of future pandemics emerging in or entering Australia, but also provide a model for prevention strategies around the world.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnimalsAustraliaHumansRisk ManagementSARS-CoV-2ZoonosesAustraliaEnvironmentGovernanceLawOne HealthPandemicPreventionZoonose

Identifiers

PMID35883185
PMCPMC9321311
OpenAlexW4288038743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.