ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022
The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-based 3D planning-supported stem-free screw-cement augmentation versus 2D radiograph-planned short-stem reconstruction for AORI type I-II medial tibial defects in TKA: a two-year retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Femoral finite element analysis of a novel cementless revision total knee arthroplasty system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cement and screw reconstruction for Rand type II bone defects during total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Finite element analysis of three reconstruction strategies for AORI IIA tibial bone defects in TKA.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with a significant bone defect in the medial tibial plateau: Case series and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Application strategy of finite element analysis in artificial knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Biomechanical evaluation of screw and cement placement strategies for treating medial uncontained tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe cement-screw technique is a convenient method to repair tibial plateau defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal angle of screw insertions is unknown. This study aimed to perform a finite element analysis (FEA) to determine the optimal screw angle for the repair of tibial plateau defects in TKA.
methodsSeven FEA models were set and two common different defects (defect 1: area < 12%, depth < 12 mm; defect 2: area > 12%, depth > 12 mm) were simulated. One screw was used in defect 1, and one or two screws were used in defect 2. Screws were parallel to the proximal cortical bone (oblique screw) or perpendicular to the upper surface (vertical screw) of the tibia. Contact stresses on cancellous bone in different areas were determined. Maximum principal stress on the cancellous bone around each screw was also compared.
resultsThe FEA models showed that stresses on the surface of cancellous bone in tibial defect (0.13-0.39 MPa) and stress focus spot (0.45 MPa) around the screw were lower when one vertical screw was used in defect 1. The stresses on the surface of cancellous bone in tibial defect (0.09-0.44 MPa), stresses in the medial tibial plateau (0.14-0.21 MPa), and stress focus spot around the screws were lowest (0.42 MPa and 1.37 MPa) when two vertical screws were used in defect 2, followed by of one vertical and one oblique (0.16-0.48 MPa; 0.15-0.21 MPa; 1.63 MPa and 1.11 MPa). No other statistically significant differences were found.
conclusionsEither for one or two screws, those perpendicular to the upper surface achieve better stability than those parallel to the proximal cortical bone of the tibia. If two vertical screws cannot be performed, one vertical and one oblique is also acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.