Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883132›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022

Insights on conducting digital patient and public involvement in dementia research during the COVID-19 pandemic: supporting the development of an "E-nabling digital co-production" framework.

Mauricio Molinari-Ulate, Rebecca Woodcock, Isabelle Smith, Henriëtte G van der Roest, Manuel A Franco-Martín, Michael P Craven

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Family Carer Involvement in Dementia Care Research: A Scoping Review and Expert Consultation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Perspective of Nurses and Healthcare Providers on the use of Television Videos with People with Moderate to Severe Dementia.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adapting Patient and Public Involvement processes in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mauricio Molinari-UlatePsycho-Sciences Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. mmolinari@ides.es.
Rebecca WoodcockNIHR MindTech MedTech Co-Operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Isabelle SmithNIHR MindTech MedTech Co-Operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Henriëtte G van der RoestDepartment on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Manuel A Franco-MartínPsycho-Sciences Research Group, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Michael P CravenNIHR MindTech MedTech Co-Operative, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative · GBHospital Virgen de la Concha · ESTrimbos Institute · NLUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 813196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid transition to digital working, accelerated due to the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has impacted the involvement of patients and public in research. This paper presents experiences of engaging in digital Patient and Public Involvement (e-PPI) in dementia research since the lockdowns, offering recommendations regarding future digital and hybrid working. Furthermore, it introduces a co-produced framework for researchers, PPI coordinators and public contributors to identify and discuss challenges and opportunities provided by e-PPI.

methodsTwo online workshops and one individual interview were performed with a group of researchers and PPI coordinators with experience in PPI in dementia research, and with an existing dementia PPI group having some experience of working online during the pandemic. The project was constructed as a PPI activity, with the MindTech Involvement Team (PPI group) involved in the entire process, and a collaborative data analysis process was adopted.

resultsAfter refinement of the coding structure, the MindTech Involvement Team and Project Leaders identified four main themes, resulting in the 'E-nabling Digital Co-production' Framework. During this framework development, different positions were expressed, associated with the transition to digital working. Two main themes were shared by the participating groups regarding e-PPI: wider potential reach without geographical constraints, and the perception of more business-like sessions with reduced opportunities for social interactions and communication. Specifically for dementia research, whilst e-PPI may allow public contributors to attend more meetings, potentially mutually supportive environments provided by face-to-face meetings could be diminished, with carers experiencing a possible reduction in informal respite opportunities.

conclusionsThrough involving public contributors, researchers, and PPI coordinators with a focus on digital PPI in dementia research, we were able to further refine and co-produce the 'E-nabling Digital Co-production' Framework. Demonstrating potential for analysis of benefits and limitations within e-PPI, it was possible to identify both general insights and those specific to dementia research. However, the most significant contribution of the framework is the potential to support local journeys of co-production in ongoing digital and hybrid public involvement activities.

Indexed as

Co-productionCOVID-19DementiaDementia researchPatient and public involvementPPI

Identifiers

PMID35883132
PMCPMC9321274
OpenAlexW4288069120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.