Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35883107›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Large-scale manipulation of promoter DNA methylation reveals context-specific transcriptional responses and stability.

Alex de Mendoza, Trung Viet Nguyen, Ethan Ford, Daniel Poppe, Sam Buckberry, Jahnvi Pflueger, Matthew R Grimmer, Sabine Stolzenburg, Ozren Bogdanovic, Alicia Oshlack and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic Modulation of the ACE System Underlies the Slow Aerobic Muscle Phenotype and Metabolic Exercise Response.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Promoter Methylation-Expression Coupling of Gliogenesis Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Epigenetic editing of marine medaka (Zoological research · 2026
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alex de Mendoza *Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia. a.demendozasoler@qmul.ac.uk.
Trung Viet Nguyen *Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Ethan Ford *Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Daniel PoppeAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Sam BuckberryAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Jahnvi PfluegerAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Matthew R GrimmerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 Biggy St, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Sabine StolzenburgSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Ozren BogdanovicAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Alicia OshlackThe Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Peggy J FarnhamDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 Biggy St, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Pilar BlancafortHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Ryan ListerAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia. ryan.lister@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-7239

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MYLES G COCKBURN · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Targeted epigenetic silencing of oncogenic Transcription Factors (PQ18)R01CA170370 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BLANCAFORT, PILAR · 2012 to 2015
$900k
Precision engineering of DNA methylation patterns in the human genomeR01DA036906 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA · PI BLANCAFORT, PILAR, LISTER, RYAN · 2013 to 2014
$350k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170370NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytosine DNA methylation is widely described as a transcriptional repressive mark with the capacity to silence promoters. Epigenome engineering techniques enable direct testing of the effect of induced DNA methylation on endogenous promoters; however, the downstream effects have not yet been comprehensively assessed.

resultsHere, we simultaneously induce methylation at thousands of promoters in human cells using an engineered zinc finger-DNMT3A fusion protein, enabling us to test the effect of forced DNA methylation upon transcription, chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, and DNA methylation persistence after the removal of the fusion protein. We find that transcriptional responses to DNA methylation are highly context-specific, including lack of repression, as well as cases of increased gene expression, which appears to be driven by the eviction of methyl-sensitive transcriptional repressors. Furthermore, we find that some regulatory networks can override DNA methylation and that promoter methylation can cause alternative promoter usage. DNA methylation deposited at promoter and distal regulatory regions is rapidly erased after removal of the zinc finger-DNMT3A fusion protein, in a process combining passive and TET-mediated demethylation. Finally, we demonstrate that induced DNA methylation can exist simultaneously on promoter nucleosomes that possess the active histone modification H3K4me3, or DNA bound by the initiated form of RNA polymerase II.

conclusionsThese findings have important implications for epigenome engineering and demonstrate that the response of promoters to DNA methylation is more complex than previously appreciated.

Indexed as

DNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationChromatinCpG IslandsDNAHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsChromatinDNADNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesTranscription FactorsCpG islandsDNA methylationDNMTEpigenome engineeringPromoter regulationZinc finger

Identifiers

PMID35883107
PMCPMC9316731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.