ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022
Clinical significance of spread of lipiodol marking for pulmonary nodules and its influence on surgery.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-guided methylene blue staining to facilitate thoracoscopic resection of intermediate-to-deep pulmonary metastases in pediatric patients.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- A retrospective evaluation of risk factors for an inadequate surgical margin in preoperative lipiodol marking for small-sized pulmonary lesions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveComputed tomography (CT)-guided lipiodol marking is one of the targeting methods for resecting small pulmonary nodules or ground-glass nodules in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, lipiodol spreading during marking has not been assessed, practically. In this study, we examined the clinical significance and the influence of lipiodol spreading on surgery.
methodsFrom April 2010 to March 2021, 176 pulmonary nodules in 167 patients were marked with lipiodol under CT guided before VATS. The marking images after lipiodol injection were classified into "Spread" and "non-Spread." Lung resection was sequentially performed on the same day.
resultsAll target nodules were successfully resected in VATS. In the classification of marking images, Spread was 32 (18%), non-Spread was 144 (82%). There was a significant difference in duration of surgery (mean; 138.7 min vs. 118.3 min, p = 0.0496) and amount of bleeding (mean; 32.7 g vs. 11.2 g, p = 0.0173). Provided that limited to the data of wedge resections without intrathoracic pleural adhesion (n = 117), there was no significant difference in duration of surgery (mean; 104.8 min vs. 99.6 min, p = 0.48), amount of bleeding (mean; 4.9 g vs. 5.3 g, p = 0.58). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk factor of lipiodol spreading was intrathoracic pleural adhesion (odds ratio: 3.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-8.97, p = 0.03). There was no relationship between marking image and complication rate.
conclusionsLipiodol spreading did not directly influence surgery and complication. However, it was a sign of intrathoracic pleural adhesion, which could lead to increased duration of surgery and amount of bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35882824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.