Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35882767›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Generating Synthesized Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Images from Anterior Segment Optical Coherent Tomography Images by Generative Adversarial Networks for Iridociliary Assessment.

Hongfei Ye, Yuan Yang, Kerong Mao, Yafu Wang, Yiqian Hu, Yu Xu, Ping Fei, Jiao Lyv, Li Chen, Peiquan Zhao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongfei YeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6129-8507
Yuan YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Kerong MaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yafu WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yiqian HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yu XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Ping FeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Jiao LyvDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Peiquan ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China. zhaopeiquan@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Ce ZhengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, China. zhengce@xinhuamed.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-9138
XinHua Hospital · CN

Funding

Hospital Funded Clinical Research, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 21XJMR02Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University YG2021QN52National Natural Science Foundation of China 81371010National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of generating synthesized ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images from swept-source anterior segment optical coherent tomography (SS-ASOCT) images using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network framework (CycleGAN) for iridociliary assessment on a cohort presenting for primary angle-closure screening.

methodsThe CycleGAN architecture was adopted to synthesize high-resolution UBM images trained on the SS-ASOCT dataset from the department of ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital. The performance of the CycleGAN model was further tested in two separate datasets using synthetic UBM images from two different ASOCT modalities (in-distribution and out-of-distribution). We compared the ability of glaucoma specialists to assess the image quality of real and synthetic images. UBM measurements, including anterior chamber, iridociliary parameters, were compared between real and synthetic UBM images. Intra-class correlation coefficients, coefficients of variation, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement. The Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) was measured to evaluate the quality of the synthetic images.

resultsThe whole trained dataset included anterior chamber angle images, of which 4037 were obtained by SS-ASOCT and 2206 were obtained by UBM. The image quality of real versus synthetic SS-ASOCT images was similar as assessed by two glaucoma specialists. The Bland-Altman analysis also suggested high consistency between measurements of real and synthetic UBM images. In addition, there was fair to excellent agreement between real and synthetic UBM measurements for the in-distribution dataset (ICC range 0.48-0.97) and the out-of-distribution dataset (ICC range 0.52-0.86). The FID was 21.3 and 24.1 for the synthetic UBM images from the in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, respectively.

conclusionWe developed a CycleGAN model to translate UBM images from non-contact SS-ASOCT images. The CycleGAN synthetic UBM images showed fair to excellent reproducibility when compared with real UBM images. Our results suggest that the CycleGAN technique is a promising tool to evaluate the iridociliary and anterior chamber in an alternative non-contact method.

Indexed as

Anterior segment optical coherence tomographyDeep learningGenerative adversarial networksUltrasound biomicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35882767
PMCPMC9437167
OpenAlexW4288081409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.