ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023
Context consistency improves ensemble perception of facial expressions.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual and ensemble perception in naturalistic scenes: Effects of context and presentation time.PloS one · 2026Article
- Color category and inter-item interaction influence color working memory codependently.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Ensemble Coding of Crowd with Cross-Category Facial Expressions.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Memory matching features bias the ensemble perception of facial identity.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans have developed the capacity to rapidly extract summary statistics from the facial expressions of a crowd, such as computing the average facial expression. Although dual-task paradigms involving memory and ensemble tasks have recently found that this ensemble coding ability is biased by visual working memory, few studies have examined whether the context-dependent nature of memory itself can influence the perceptual averaging process. In two experiments, participants made forced-choice judgments about mean facial expressions that were paired with task-irrelevant background images, and the background images either matched or mismatched across encoding and response phases. When the backgrounds matched, it was at either the perceptual level (uniformly oriented lines with the same orientation in encoding and response phases, in Experiment 1), or at the summary statistics level (uniformly oriented lines in the response phase that had the same orientation as the mean of randomly oriented lines that were seen in the encoding phase, in Experiment 2). Participants in Experiment 1 showed a higher ensemble precision and better discrimination sensitivity when the backgrounds matched than when they mismatched, which is consistent with the kind of robust contextual memory effect that has been seen in prior research. We further demonstrated that the context-matching facilitation effect occurred at both the perceptual level (Experiment 1) and at the summary statistics level (Experiment 2). These results demonstrate that the effects of visual working memory on perceptual averaging are obligatory, and they highlight the importance of memory-related context dependency in perceptual averaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35882720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.