Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35882640›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022

Scientometric analysis of Indian Orthopaedic Research in the last two decades.

Raju Vaishya, Brij Mohan Gupta, Mallikarjun Kappi, Abhishek Vaish

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Rise of Asian research in orthopaedic and sports medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2022.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Global trend of publications in orthopaedics and sports medicine: 1996 - 2021.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024
    Review
  6. Upsurge in Indian publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024
    Article
  7. Scientometric analysis of highly cited papers on avascular necrosis of the femoral head from 1991 to 2022.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raju VaishyaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, 110076, India. raju.vaishya@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-9533
Brij Mohan GuptaCSIR-NISTADS, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Mallikarjun KappiGovernment First Grade College Jagalur, Karnataka, 577528, India.
Abhishek VaishDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, 110076, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to examine India's orthopaedic research output during 2002-2021 to analyze the research characteristics and publication performances of leading organizations, authors, and cities, the core journals publishing research, broad subject areas, sub-specialties, and the classification by anatomical location, the subject areas of research using major keywords and the sources of funding and the extent of international collaboration.

methodsIndia's orthopaedic publications data was identified and downloaded from the Scopus database ( https://www.scopus.com ) using a well-defined search strategy and keywords.

resultsIndia's 4606 publications grew at a 20.8% annual growth rate and averaged 11.3 citations per paper. The 10.4% and 16.3% share of India's papers received external funded support and were involved in international collaboration. The USA and UK (31.8% and 21.3%) represent the highest collaborative share in India's international collaborative publications. AIIMS-New Delhi and PGIMER-Chandigarh produced a larger proportion of articles (5.2% and 4.3%) among contributing organizations. In terms of authors, R. Vaishya and S. Rajasekaran are the most productive ones, contributing 1.6% and 1.1% share respectively. Clinical studies, paediatric sub-specialty, and knee & leg anatomical location accounted for the largest share of papers (32.2%, 10.8%, and 7.5%).The most frequent keywords co-occurrences were "Orthopaedic Surgery," "Hydroxyapatite," "Biocompatibility," "Orthopaedic Procedures," "Bone," "Surgical Techniques," "Biomaterials," and "Osteosynthesis."

conclusionThis study revealed the characteristics and trends of research and core publications from Indian authors and organizations identified in the last two decades. This research should provide useful insights into the research hotspots of India in the present, past, and future.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsBibliometricsBiocompatible MaterialsChildHumansHydroxyapatitesBiocompatible MaterialsHydroxyapatitesBibliometricsIndiaOrthopedicsResearchScientometrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.