Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35882607›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2022

Cervical cancer patient reported gastrointestinal outcomes: intensity/volumetric modulated vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Ryan Urban, Justin Wong, Peter Lim, Susan Zhang, Ingrid Spadinger, Robert Olson, Francois Bachand, Clement Ho, Anna V Tinker, Lovedeep Gondara and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan UrbanDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2929-5565
Justin WongDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-3603
Peter LimDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3507-5112
Susan ZhangDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5164-8518
Ingrid SpadingerDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3647-6858
Robert OlsonDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-6197
Francois BachandDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3661-9767
Clement HoDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5818-9780
Anna V TinkerDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-7746
Lovedeep GondaraDepartment of Population Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1707-8141
Sarah Nicole HamiltonDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-2599

Funding

Varian Medical SystemsVGH and UBC Hospital Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) patient reported outcomes (PROs) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) vs. intensity modulated/volumetric modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT).

methodsAn analysis of patients treated with definitive RT between 2015-2018 was performed. GI PROs were prospectively collected at baseline, during RT (acute), ≤12 weeks after RT (subacute), and >12 weeks after RT (late). GI PROs evaluated three symptom domains: bowel problems (BPs), bowel bother (BB), and abdominal problems (APs). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between mean changes of symptom scores with clinical and dosimetric variables.

resultsThe cohort included 167 patients. A total of 100 (60%) patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and 67 (40%) with 3DCRT. In the subacute phase, the mean change of symptom scores from baseline in 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT were +0.9 vs. -1.15 (p=0.004) for BP, +2.18 vs. -0.10 (p=0.019) for BB, and +1.41 vs. -0.38 (p=0.021) for AP. Likewise, in the late phase, mean changes were +0.72 vs. -0.82 (p=0.014) for BP, +1.98 vs. -0.03 (p=0.008) for BB, and +1.29 vs. -0.31 (p<0.001) for AP. On multiple linear regression, use of 3DCRT vs. IMRT/VMAT was associated with greater mean changes in subacute BP (p=0.023) and late phase AP (p=0.019). A higher small bowel V50Gy was associated increased symptom scores in late AP (p=0.012).

conclusion3DCRT was associated with significantly greater worsening of GI PRO symptom scores in the subacute and late phase. These data support the ongoing use of IMRT/VMAT in routine practice.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRadiotherapy DosageAbnormalities, Radiation InducedCervical CancerGastrointestinal TractPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Identifiers

PMID35882607
PMCPMC9428301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.