Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35882605›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gynecologic oncology2022

The added value of SLN mapping with indocyanine green in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lara C Burg, Shenna Verheijen, Ruud L M Bekkers, Joanna IntHout, Robert W Holloway, Salih Taskin, Sarah E Ferguson, Yu Xue, Antonino Ditto, Glauco Baiocchi and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Lara C BurgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Lara.Burg@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4852-2118
Shenna VerheijenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4904-4421
Ruud L M BekkersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4577-8495
Joanna IntHoutDepartment for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6127-0747
Robert W HollowayGynecologic Oncology Program, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3121-4605
Salih TaskinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9651-2224
Sarah E FergusonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0151-5594
Yu XueDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8319-6691
Antonino DittoDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-8225
Glauco BaiocchiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8193-5582
Andrea PapadiaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4909-9588
Giorgio BoganiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urologynecological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8569
Alessandro BudaObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ospedale San Gerardo di Monza, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7093-6862
Roy F P M KruitwagenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1305-9541
Petra L M ZusterzeelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9547-6367
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAC Camargo Hospital · BRAnkara University · TRAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITFlorida Hospital Cancer Institute · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the SLN detection rate in presumed early stage, low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers, the incidence of SLN metastases, and the negative predictive value of SLN mapping performed with indocyanine green (ICG).

methodsA systematic review with meta-analyses was conducted. Study inclusion criteria were A) low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, B) the use of ICG per cervical injection; C) a minimum of twenty included patients per study. To assess the negative predictive value of SLN mapping, D) a subsequent lymphadenectomy was an additional inclusion criterion.

resultsFourteen studies were selected, involving 2,117 patients. The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]=92.4%-97.9%) and 76.5% (95% CI=68.1%-84.0%), respectively. The incidence of SLN metastases was 9.6% (95% CI=5.1%-15.2%) in patients with grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 11.8% (95% CI=8.1%-16.1%) in patients with grade 1-3 endometrial cancer. The negative predictive value of SLN mapping was 100% (95% CI=98.8%-100%) in studies that included grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 99.2% (95% CI=97.9%-99.9%) in studies that also included grade 3.

conclusionSLN mapping with ICG is feasible with a high detection rate and negative predictive value in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. Given the incidence of SLN metastases is approximately 10% in those patients, SLN mapping may lead to stage shifting with potential therapeutic consequences. Given the high negative predictive value with SLN mapping, routine lymphadenectomy should be omitted in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph NodeColoring AgentsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenLymph Node ExcisionSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyColoring AgentsIndocyanine GreenEndometrial CancerIndocyanine GreenLymphadenectomyMeta-AnalysisSentinel Lymph Node MappingSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID35882605
PMCPMC9428296
OpenAlexW4285176477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.