Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881617›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Development of transgenic models susceptible and resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection in FVB background mice.

Sun-Min Seo, Jae Hyung Son, Ji-Hun Lee, Na-Won Kim, Eun-Seon Yoo, Ah-Reum Kang, Ji Yun Jang, Da In On, Hyun Ah Noh, Jun-Won Yun and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sun-Min SeoDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7543-846X
Jae Hyung SonGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hun LeeDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Na-Won KimDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2655-539X
Eun-Seon YooDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ah-Reum KangDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Yun JangGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.
Da In OnKorea Mouse Phenotyping Center (KMPC), Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Ah NohKorea Mouse Phenotyping Center (KMPC), Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-6730
Jun-Won YunDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Jun Won ParkDivision of Biomedical Convergence, College of Biomedical Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Kang-Seuk ChoiLaboratory of Avian Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Young LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jeon-Soo ShinDepartment of Microbiology, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young SeoSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ki Taek NamSeverance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-1280
Ho LeeGraduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.
Je Kyung SeongLaboratory of Developmental Biology and Genomics, Research Institute for Veterinary Science, and BK 21 PLUS Program for Creative Veterinary Science Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1177-6958
Yang-Kyu ChoiDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4969-5443
Konkuk University · KRSeoul National University · KRYonsei University · KRDongguk University · KRKangwon National University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is currently spreading globally. To overcome the COVID-19 pandemic, preclinical evaluations of vaccines and therapeutics using K18-hACE2 and CAG-hACE2 transgenic mice are ongoing. However, a comparative study on SARS-CoV-2 infection between K18-hACE2 and CAG-hACE2 mice has not been published. In this study, we compared the susceptibility and resistance to SARS-CoV-2 infection between two strains of transgenic mice, which were generated in FVB background mice. K18-hACE2 mice exhibited severe weight loss with definitive lethality, but CAG-hACE2 mice survived; and differences were observed in the lung, spleen, cerebrum, cerebellum, and small intestine. A higher viral titer was detected in the lungs, cerebrums, and cerebellums of K18-hACE2 mice than in the lungs of CAG-hACE2 mice. Severe pneumonia was observed in histopathological findings in K18-hACE2, and mild pneumonia was observed in CAG-hACE2. Atrophy of the splenic white pulp and reduction of spleen weight was observed, and hyperplasia of goblet cells with villi atrophy of the small intestine was observed in K18-hACE2 mice compared to CAG-hACE2 mice. These results indicate that K18-hACE2 mice are relatively susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and that CAG-hACE2 mice are resistant to SARS-CoV-2. Based on these lineage-specific sensitivities, we suggest that K18-hACE2 mouse is suitable for highly susceptible model of SARS-CoV-2, and CAG-hACE2 mouse is suitable for mild susceptible model of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19PneumoniaAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAtrophyDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityHumansLungMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, TransgenicPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A

Identifiers

PMID35881617
PMCPMC9321403
OpenAlexW4288035410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.