Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881593›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Changes in key recruitment performance metrics from 2008-2019 in industry-sponsored phase III clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Mette Brøgger-Mikkelsen, John Robert Zibert, Anders Daniel Andersen, Ulrik Lassen, Merete Hædersdal, Zarqa Ali, Simon Francis Thomsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Identifying and Deploying Benchmarks for Clinical Research at Sites.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette Brøgger-MikkelsenDepartment of Dermato-Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John Robert ZibertStudies&Me A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Daniel AndersenStudies&Me A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik LassenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Merete HædersdalDepartment of Dermato-Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zarqa AliDepartment of Dermato-Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2411-7177
Simon Francis ThomsenDepartment of Dermato-Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing costs and complexity in clinical trials requires recruitment of more narrowly defined patient populations. However, recruitment for clinical trials remains a considerable challenge.

aimOur overall aim was to quantify recruitment performance in industry-sponsored phase III clinical trials conducted globally during 2008-2019 with primary aim to examine development of overall clinical trial measures (number of trials completed, number of participants enrolled, trial duration in months) and key recruitment metrics (recruitment rate, number of sites, number of patients enrolled per site).

methodsThe publicly available AACT database containing data on all trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov since 2008 was used. The analysis was completed during three time periods from 2008-2019 of 4 years each. RESULTS AND

conclusionRecruitment duration for industry-sponsored phase III clinical trials have increased significantly during the last 12 years from an average recruitment period of 13 months (IQR 7-23) in 2008-2011 to 18 months (IQR 11-28) in 2016-2019 (p = 0.0068). Further, phase III clinical trials have increased the number of registered sites per clinical trial by more than 30% during the last 12 years from a median number 43 sites (IQR 17-84) in 2012-2015 to 64 sites (IQR 30-118) in 2016-2019 (p = 0.025), and concurrently, the number of participants enrolled in clinical research has decreased significantly from 2012-2015 and 2016-2019 (p = 0.046). We believe that these findings indicate that recruitment for phase III clinical trials is less effective today compared to 12 years ago.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansIndustry

Identifiers

PMID35881593
PMCPMC9321424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.