Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881578›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Patient safety culture in primary health care: Medical office survey on patient safety culture in a Brazilian family health strategy setting.

Gleiton Lima Araújo, Fábio Ferreira Amorim, Rafaela Cristina Pereira Santos de Miranda, Flávio Ferreira Pontes Amorim, Levy Aniceto Santana, Leila Bernarda Donato Göttems

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gleiton Lima AraújoPostgraduation Program in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2791-7831
Fábio Ferreira AmorimPostgraduation Program in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-5733
Rafaela Cristina Pereira Santos de MirandaPostgraduation Program in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2165-0745
Flávio Ferreira Pontes AmorimUniversidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Levy Aniceto SantanaPostgraduation Program in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7743-4892
Leila Bernarda Donato GöttemsPostgraduation Program in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-8085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo assess the patient safety culture in Primary Health Care (PHC) setting after the transition to the Family Health Strategy (FHS) model in a Brazilian metropolitan area and compare the results between the categories of health care professionals.

methodsA cross-sectional study including 246 workers from primary health care services in Federal District, Brazil. Data collection took place from October to December 2019 through the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC) application. Patient safety culture was considered positive when the score was above 60%. For comparisons between the categories of health care professionals', the ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for composite percent positive scores, and Pearson's chi-square or Fishers exact test for frequency and percentage of positive responses.

resultsThe overall MOSPSC composite percent positive score was 49.9%. Among the 12 dimensions, only three showed a positive patient safety culture: Teamwork (73.1%), Organizational learning (62.9%), and Patient care tracking/follow-up (60.1%). The percentage of positive responses on overall quality assessment (78.1%) and overall patient safety assessment (78.0%) showed a positive evaluation. There was no significant difference in the composite percent positive score of overall MOSPSC (p = 0.135) and the percentage of positive responses on overall patient safety assessment (p = 0.156) between the categories of health care professionals. Overall quality assessment showed a significant difference between job roles (p < 0.001), in which nursing /health care technicians showed a significantly lower score than other job roles.

conclusionThe patient safety culture assessment showed a weakness in the patient safety in the PHC services. The MOSPSC and nine of its dimensions presented a negative safety culture assessment, regardless of the high scores in the overall patient safety and quality assessments.

Indexed as

Family HealthPatient SafetyAttitude of Health PersonnelBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOrganizational CulturePrimary Health CareSafety ManagementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35881578
PMCPMC9321378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.