Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881572›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Restriction on antimicrobial dispensing without prescription on a national level: Impact on the overall antimicrobial utilization in the community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia.

Ahmed Hamdan Al-Jedai, Yasser Almogbel, Khalid Eljaaly, Nasser M Alqahtani, Hajer Yousef Almudaiheem, Nancy Awad, Dema Abdulrahman Alissa, Abdullah Assiri, Tareef Alaama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A One Health Perspective onMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The epidemiology of gram-negative bacteremia in Lebanon: a study in four hospitals.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed Hamdan Al-JedaiTherapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-9086
Yasser AlmogbelDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0155-6986
Khalid EljaalyClinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8355-8637
Nasser M AlqahtaniRiyadh First Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hajer Yousef AlmudaiheemTherapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-6193
Nancy AwadReal World Evidence, IQVIA, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Dema Abdulrahman AlissaTherapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2601-8853
Abdullah AssiriAssistant Deputy Ministry of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tareef AlaamaTherapeutic Affairs Deputyship, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh rates of non-prescription dispensing of antimicrobials have led to a significant increase in the antimicrobial overuse and misuse in Saudi Arabia (SA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial utilization following the enforcement of a new prescription-only antimicrobial dispensing policy in the community pharmacy setting in SA.

methodsData were extracted from the IQVIA database between May 2017 and May 2019. The antimicrobial utilization rates, based on sales, defined daily dose in grams (DDD), DDD/1000 inhabitants/day (DID), and antimicrobial-claims for the pre-policy (May 2017 to April 2018) and post-policy (June 2018 to May 2019) periods were assessed.

resultsOverall antimicrobial utilization declined slightly (~9-10%) in the post-policy versus pre-policy period (sales, 31,334 versus 34,492 thousand units; DDD, 183,134 versus 202,936), with higher claims (~16%) after policy implementation. There was a sudden drop in the utilization rate immediately after policy enforcement; however, the values increased subsequently, closely matching the pre-policy values. Utilization patterns were similar in both periods; penicillin was the most used antimicrobial (sales: 11,648-14,700-thousand units; DDD: 71,038-91,227; DID: 2.88-3.78). For both periods, the highest dip in utilization was observed in July (sales: 1,027-1,559 thousand units; DDD: 6,194-9,399), while the highest spike was in March/October (sales: 3,346-3,884 thousand units; DDD: 22,329-19,453).

conclusionNon-prescription antimicrobial utilization reduced minimally following policy implementation in the community pharmacies across SA. Effective implementation of prescription-only regulations is necessary.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsPharmaciesAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillinsSaudi ArabiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID35881572
PMCPMC9321410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.