Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881546›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Targeting the DNA Damage Response Pathways and Replication Stress in Colorectal Cancer.

Erika Durinikova, Nicole M Reilly, Kristi Buzo, Elisa Mariella, Rosaria Chilà, Annalisa Lorenzato, João M L Dias, Gaia Grasso, Federica Pisati, Simona Lamba and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Targeting theBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Erika DurinikovaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Nicole M ReillyCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Kristi BuzoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8195-5260
Elisa MariellaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-8116
Rosaria ChilàDepartment of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy.
Annalisa LorenzatoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
João M L DiasDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-3537
Gaia GrassoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1455-6846
Federica PisatiHistopathology Unit, Cogentech, Milan, Italy.
Simona LambaCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Giorgio CortiCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6379-4117
Andrea DegasperiDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6879-0596
Carlotta CancelliereCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
Gianluca MauriIFOM ETS - The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7646-0973
Pietro AndreiCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0220-2760
Michael LinnebacherClinic of General Surgery, Molecular Oncology and Immunotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8054-1402
Silvia MarsoniIFOM ETS - The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5361-7122
Salvatore SienaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2681-2846
Andrea Sartore-BianchiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-0409
Serena Nik-ZainalDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5054-1727
Federica Di NicolantonioCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-2010
Alberto Bardelli *Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1647-5070
Sabrina Arena *Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-2494
Candiolo Cancer Institute · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Milan · ITIFOM · ITMitsubishi Heavy Industries (Italy) · ITUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22932Cancer Research UK 23433Cancer Research UK 23916Cancer Research UK 27815Cancer Research UK A23916Cancer Research UK A26825Cancer Research UK A28223Cancer Research UK C60100/A23916Cancer Research UK C60100/A27815Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenomic instability is a hallmark of cancer and targeting DNA damage response (DDR) is emerging as a promising therapeutic strategy in different solid tumors. The effectiveness of targeting DDR in colorectal cancer has not been extensively explored. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe challenged 112 cell models recapitulating the genomic landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer with ATM, ATR, CHK1, WEE1, and DNA-PK inhibitors, in parallel with chemotherapeutic agents. We focused then on ATR inhibitors (ATRi) and, to identify putative biomarkers of response and resistance, we analyzed at multiple levels colorectal cancer models highly sensitive or resistant to these drugs.

resultsWe found that around 30% of colorectal cancers, including those carrying KRAS and BRAF mutations and unresponsive to targeted agents, are sensitive to at least one DDR inhibitor. By investigating potential biomarkers of response to ATRi, we found that ATRi-sensitive cells displayed reduced phospho-RPA32 foci at basal level, while ATRi-resistant cells showed increased RAD51 foci formation in response to replication stress. Lack of ATM and RAD51C expression was associated with ATRi sensitivity. Analysis of mutational signatures and HRDetect score identified a subgroup of ATRi-sensitive models. Organoids derived from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer recapitulated findings obtained in cell lines.

conclusionsIn conclusion, a subset of colorectal cancers refractory to current therapies could benefit from inhibitors of DDR pathways and replication stress. A composite biomarker involving phospho-RPA32 and RAD51 foci, lack of ATM and RAD51C expression, as well as analysis of mutational signatures could be used to identify colorectal cancers likely to respond to ATRi.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA DamageDNA ReplicationHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsDNA-Activated Protein KinaseProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35881546
PMCPMC9433963
OpenAlexW4288042084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.