Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881395›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Use of Daily Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Pediatric Cancer Care.

Andreas Meryk, Gabriele Kropshofer, Benjamin Hetzer, David Riedl, Jens Lehmann, Gerhard Rumpold, Alexandra Haid, Verena Schneeberger-Carta, Bernhard Holzner, Roman Crazzolara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Designing oncology-specific patient-reported outcome dashboards: end-user preferences for reference curve inclusion and visualization in pediatric cancer care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of an electronic system for self/proxy symptom tracking alongside children with cancer and their caregivers: a co-design exemplar.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Adherence to daily electronic symptom screening in pediatric cancer: associations with time, location and pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Disagreement between mothers' and fathers' rating of health-related quality of life in children with cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas MerykDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gabriele KropshoferDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Benjamin HetzerDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
David RiedlDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jens LehmannDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerhard RumpoldDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexandra HaidDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Verena Schneeberger-CartaDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard HolznerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Roman CrazzolaraDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · ATInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of adult cancer care, but little has been done with regard to PROMs for pediatric cancer care. Objectives: To identify pediatric patients with cancer who are at risk of severe adverse effects of treatment and provide individualized supportive care using PROMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center cohort study with PROMs implemented in daily clinical routine was conducted from May 1, 2020, to November 15, 2021, among pediatric patients with a cancer diagnosis or their proxies. Inclusion criteria were treatment with chemotherapy and at least 30 days of active participation. Patients were followed up until completion of therapy or through ongoing therapy until November 15, 2021; data were analyzed from November 15, 2021, through January 31, 2022. Exposures: Cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was occurrence and severity of ubiquitous complications of cancer treatment, such as nausea, appetite loss, pain, sleep disturbance, and deterioration of physical functioning. The secondary outcome was the identification of early and appropriate clinical interventions based on detection of cancer-related symptoms via PROMs. Results: A total of 4410 daily PROMs from 7082 therapy days for 40 children (35 children aged 5-18 years and 5 proxies for children aged 1-4 years) (median age, 9.1 [IQR, 6.3-12.2] years; 26 [65.0%] male) were analyzed during a median follow-up of 145.5 (IQR, 103.8-244.5) days. All participants were White. The overall median completion rate was 60.1% (IQR, 37.9%-81.0%); this rate was slightly lower during home care vs inpatient stay (57.5% [IQR, 30.7%-85.9%] vs 65.0% [IQR, 49.6%-92.5%], respectively; P = .01), with a decreasing trend over time (65.6% [IQR, 51.6%-85.9%] for the first 90 days vs 42.9% [IQR, 29.3%-82.3%] for beyond 90 days; P < .001). Severe symptoms were reported on 657 days (14.9%); most symptoms were associated with physical functioning, followed by pain, sleep disturbance, and nausea and appetite loss. In total, 321 adverse events (AEs) and cases of health deterioration were documented, and PROMs were completed for 251 (78.2%) of these events. Across all AEs, self-reported pain was the most useful marker, particularly when analyzed on the day before onset, and was associated with an odds ratio of 3.65 (95% CI, 1.54-8.62; P = .005) for the presence of mucositis. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that PROMs reflect daily symptoms in pediatric patients with cancer and assist in clinical management and intervention for AEs.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdultChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNauseaPainPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID35881395
PMCPMC9327576
OpenAlexW4288034931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.