Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881349›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the Plasmodium falciparum Genome.

Sophie Adjalley, Marcus Chee San Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional validation of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Systematic in vitro evolution inScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie AdjalleyWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Marcus Chee San LeeWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK. ml31@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-0915
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to interrogate gene function in Plasmodium parasites has been greatly enhanced by the advent of CRISPR/Cas9 systems. The breadth of genome manipulations ranges from single point mutations to large multigene deletions, however many of the technical considerations for designing CRISPR-based experiments are common to any editing approach. This review will discuss protocols for vector construction and donor design for genome editing P. falciparum, including pitfalls, variables, and validation methods.

Indexed as

PlasmodiumPlasmodium falciparumCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, ProtozoanCas9CRISPRDNA repairDonor templateMalariaP. falciparum genome editing

Identifiers

PMID35881349
OpenAlexW4288062067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.