Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881313›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2022

Repurposing Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Devices for Variant Tracking.

Mikel Urrutikoetxea-Gutierrez, Maria Carmen Nieto Toboso, Estibaliz Ugalde Zarraga, Mikele Macho Aizpurua, Jose Luis Diaz de Tuesta Del Arco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mikel Urrutikoetxea-GutierrezClinical Microbiology Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain. mikel.j.urruti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-0189
Maria Carmen Nieto TobosoClinical Microbiology Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Estibaliz Ugalde ZarragaClinical Microbiology Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Mikele Macho AizpuruaClinical Microbiology Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Jose Luis Diaz de Tuesta Del ArcoClinical Microbiology Service, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the very beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, one of the very few common opinions was that to control the expansion of the virus as many as the possible test had to be done. Antigen tests, being affordable and easy and fast to use, represented a great opportunity to expand the testing capacities of many healthcare systems. However, in 2021 with the appearance of the new SARS-CoV-2 variants, variant tracking strategies had to be implemented, which often included needing a second test to determine the variant of the patients diagnosed with antigen tests or not taking these samples into consideration at all. Therefore, we proposed recovering the positive antigen test devices to include them in our routine variant tracking strategy. The recovered positive antigen test devices obtained from 1st April 2021 to 15the January 2022 were analysed following the variant tracking protocol in force. The results obtained were compared to the positive samples detected by RT-PCR which were processed for variant tracking during the same period. 21,304 samples were processed, 6297 from the recovered positive antigen devices and 15,007 from the standard nasopharyngeal swabs. Only 773 (3.63%) samples were no conclusive, 104 (1.65%) from the recovered antigen devices and 669 (4.46%) from the RT-PCR positive group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Taking this into account the proposed method is suitable and very recommendable, as it is an important measure to have a better and immediate picture of the circulating variants in every community.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansPandemicsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID35881313
PMCPMC9315323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.