ArticleCurrent microbiology2022
Repurposing Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Devices for Variant Tracking.
Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From the very beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, one of the very few common opinions was that to control the expansion of the virus as many as the possible test had to be done. Antigen tests, being affordable and easy and fast to use, represented a great opportunity to expand the testing capacities of many healthcare systems. However, in 2021 with the appearance of the new SARS-CoV-2 variants, variant tracking strategies had to be implemented, which often included needing a second test to determine the variant of the patients diagnosed with antigen tests or not taking these samples into consideration at all. Therefore, we proposed recovering the positive antigen test devices to include them in our routine variant tracking strategy. The recovered positive antigen test devices obtained from 1st April 2021 to 15the January 2022 were analysed following the variant tracking protocol in force. The results obtained were compared to the positive samples detected by RT-PCR which were processed for variant tracking during the same period. 21,304 samples were processed, 6297 from the recovered positive antigen devices and 15,007 from the standard nasopharyngeal swabs. Only 773 (3.63%) samples were no conclusive, 104 (1.65%) from the recovered antigen devices and 669 (4.46%) from the RT-PCR positive group. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Taking this into account the proposed method is suitable and very recommendable, as it is an important measure to have a better and immediate picture of the circulating variants in every community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.