Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881254›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2022

Mapping correlated neurological deficits after stroke to distributed brain networks.

Joshua S Siegel, Gordon L Shulman, Maurizio Corbetta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding the mind-brain relationship through focal neurodegenerative pathology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joshua S SiegelDepartments of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. jssiegel@wustl.edu.
Gordon L ShulmanDepartments of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Maurizio CorbettaDepartments of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARD-MEDICAL SCIENTISTT32GM007200 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YOKOYAMA, WAYNE M. · 1985 to 2024
$59.8M
Stroke, Brain Networks, and BehaviorR01NS095741 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETTA, MAURIZIO · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTS OF STROKE USING FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY MRIR01HD061117 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETTA, MAURIZIO · 2009 to 2013
$2.8M
Washington University Psychiatry Residency Research Education ProgramR25MH112473 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NURI B FARBER, Timothy Eric Spiegel · 2018 to 2026
$1.6M
Departments ofExcellence Italian Ministry of Research MART_ECCELLENZA18_01European School of Network Neuroscience H2020-SC5-2019-2James S. McDonnell Foundation NRP 3921-26239NMinistero della Salute RF-2008 -12366899Ministero della Salute RF-2019-12369300National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 5R01HD061117NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061117NIH HHS 5T32GM007200-39NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH112473NINDS NIH HHS 5R01-NS095741-05NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095741Ricerca Scientifica di Eccellenza 55403Visionary Nature Based Actions For Health, Wellbeing & Resilience in Cities H2020-SC5-2019-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between brain organization and behavior is a central goal of neuroscience. Traditional teaching emphasizes that the human cerebrum includes many distinct areas for which damage or dysfunction would lead to a unique and specific behavioral syndrome. This teaching implies that brain areas correspond to encapsulated modules that are specialized for specific cognitive operations. However, empirically, local damage from stroke more often produces one of a small number of clusters of deficits and disrupts brain-wide connectivity in a small number of predictable ways (relative to the vast complexity of behavior and brain connectivity). Behaviors that involve shared operations show correlated deficits following a stroke, consistent with a low-dimensional behavioral space. Because of the networked organization of the brain, local damage from a stroke can result in widespread functional abnormalities, matching the low dimensionality of behavioral deficit. In alignment with this, neurological disease, psychiatric disease, and altered brain states produce behavioral changes that are highly correlated across a range of behaviors. We discuss how known structural and functional network priors in addition to graph theoretical concepts such as modularity and entropy have provided inroads to understanding this more complex relationship between brain and behavior. This model for brain disease has important implications for normal brain-behavior relationships and the treatment of neurological and psychiatric diseases.

Indexed as

Brain MappingStrokeBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetFunctional connectivityLesion-symptom mappingModularityStrokeStructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID35881254
PMCPMC12057035
OpenAlexW4288035889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.