ReviewArchives of sexual behavior2023
Access to Sexual Rights for People Living with Disabilities: Assumptions, Evidence, and Policy Outcomes.
Review in Archives of sexual behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expressive Existential Psychoeducational Intervention Treatment for Maladaptive Sexual Behavior in a Boy with Trisomy 21 Syndrome.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025Article
- 'Silent Needs and Hidden Desires': Nurses' Perceptions of Sexual Healthcare for People With Physical and/or Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Article
- Social Representations of Sexual Assistance Services for People with Physical Disabilities in the Context of Portugal.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025Article
- A human right to pleasure? Sexuality, autonomy and egalitarian strategies.Journal of medical ethics · 2024Article
- Access to Sexual Rights for all People with Disabilities: The Need to See and Include the Experiences of People with Intellectual Disability.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
- Preparing for a Sex-Positive Future Where Sexual Assistance Is a Possibility.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
- Listening to the Voices of Persons with Disabilities.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
- Perspectives on Sexual Citizenship for People Living with Disabilities: A Response to Commentaries.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
- Making Sense of Sexual Rights of the Disabled in Today's Social-Cultural-Digital World.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
- Sex Positive Rights and Public Sexual Health.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
- The Devil Is in the Details.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sexuality scholars have historically understudied the link between disability, sexual exclusion, and social justice, including equal rights for people living with disabilities (PLWD) to enjoy a sexual and intimate life in adulthood. There have been some recent efforts to rectify this situation, with studies emerging concerning strategies for promoting their sexual rights. Our Target Article explores one contentious service option-the possibility of "sexual assistance" for PLWD, which ranges in meaning across countries from sex surrogacy to physical contact with paid sexual assistants. We conducted a knowledge synthesis using a scoping review methodology to identify the breadth of the academic scholarship available and assess its alignment with current ethical and moral debates and recent policies and practices surrounding the sexual scripts of PLWD as they relate to sexual assistance. We categorized the relevant articles in our scoping review into two broad classes: those that support sex-negative perspectives (i.e., framing sexuality as risky, adversarial, etc.) and those that support sex-positive perspectives (i.e., framing sexuality as normative, consensual, etc.). Our results show that sex-negative cultural scripts call for limitations of the sexual rights of PLWD due to their inherent vulnerability as having disabled sexualities and/or due to their heightened risk of exploiting sexual partners, especially cis women who sell sexual services. The sex-positive cultural scripts understand PLWD as having the same rights to sexual citizenship as non-disabled individuals and that to achieve this, equitable access to sexual health services in decriminalized and regulated service environments is needed. We conclude with limitations of our investigation and recommendations for further research on this understudied topic, including the possible integration of positive disabled sexuality and abuse prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.