Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881242›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2022

Comparison of three risk stratification scores in gastroschisis neonates: gastroschisis prognostic score, gastroschisis risk stratification index and complex gastroschisis.

Asta Tauriainen, Arimatias Raitio, Tuomas Tauriainen, Kari Vanamo, Ulla Sankilampi, Ilkka Helenius, Anna Hyvärinen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Asta TauriainenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland. asta.tauriainen@fimnet.fi.
Arimatias RaitioDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Tuomas TauriainenDepartment of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Kari VanamoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, 70210, Kuopio, Finland.
Ulla SankilampiDepartment of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Ilkka HeleniusDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna HyvärinenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIKuopio University Hospital · FIOulu University Hospital · FITampere University · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the utility of three different risk stratification scores for gastroschisis neonates; simple/complex gastroschisis, gastroschisis prognostic score and risk stratification index.

methodsData of neonates born with gastroschisis between the years 1993 and 2015 were collected. The national registers and patient records of four Finnish University Hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic and linear regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors for adverse outcomes. The efficacy of these prognostic methods was further assessed using ROC-curves and DeLong (1988) test.

resultsGastroschisis risk stratification index was an acceptable predictor of in-hospital mortality, AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-0.91, p = 0.049. Complex gastroschisis and gastroschisis prognostic score were able to predict short bowel syndrome, AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.00, p = 0.012 and AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.00, p = 0.012, respectively.

conclusionThere are three easily obtainable risk stratification scores for outcome prediction in gastroschisis patients, however, their predictive ability did not have a statistical difference in the present study. The Gastroschisis risk stratification index seemed to perform moderately well in mortality prediction.

Indexed as

GastroschisisHospital MortalityHumansInfant, NewbornPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentComplex gastroschisisGastroschisisLevel of evidence: Level IIIRisk stratificationScore

Identifiers

PMID35881242
PMCPMC9458559
OpenAlexW4287877491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.