Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881237›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022

Improving Development of Drug Treatments for Pregnant Women and the Fetus.

Anna L David, Homa Ahmadzia, Richard Ashcroft, Christina Bucci-Rechtweg, Rebecca N Spencer, Steve Thornton

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Antioxidants: powering the fight against fetal hypoxia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna L DavidElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, UK. a.david@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-6140
Homa AhmadziaDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-1086
Richard AshcroftCity University, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-4717
Christina Bucci-RechtwegHead, Pediatric and Maternal Health Policy, Global Drug Development Regulatory Affairs, Pediatric Center of Excellence, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1250-9931
Rebecca N SpencerElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-0322
Steve ThorntonQueen Mary University of London, Dean Rees House, 2nd Floor, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7613-0408
University College Hospital · GBCity, University of London · GBGeorge Washington University · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: identifying pregnant women at risk and determining the safe and effective use of tranexamic acid using state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics modelingK23HL141640 · NHLBI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AHMADZIA, HOMA KHORRAMI · 2019 to 2022
$621k
British Heart FoundationDepartment of HealthNHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL141640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exclusion of pregnant populations, women of reproductive age, and the fetus from clinical trials of therapeutics is a major global public health issue. It is also a problem of inequity in medicines development, as pregnancy is a protected characteristic. The current regulatory requirements for drugs in pregnancy are being analyzed by a number of agencies worldwide. There has been considerable investment in developing expertise in pregnancy clinical trials (for the pregnant person and the fetus) such as the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Progress has also been made in how to define and grade clinical trial safety in pregnant women, the fetus, and neonate. Innovative methods to model human pregnancy physiology and pharmacology using computer simulations are also gaining interest. Novel ways to assess fetal well-being and placental function using magnetic resonance imaging, computerized cardiotocography, serum circulating fetoplacental proteins, and mRNA may permit better assessment of the safety and efficacy of interventions in the mother and fetus. The core outcomes in women's and newborn health initiative is facilitating the consistent reporting of data from pregnancy trials. Electronic medical records integrated with pharmacy services should improve the strength of pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacovigilance studies. Incentives such as investigational plans and orphan disease designation have been taken up for obstetric, fetal, and neonatal diseases. This review describes the progress that is being made to better understand the extent of the problem and to develop applicable solutions.

Indexed as

Cardiotonic AgentsPregnant PeopleChildFemaleFetusHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyRNA, MessengerCardiotonic AgentsRNA, MessengerAdverse eventFetusPregnancy clinical trialSafetyTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID35881237
PMCPMC9315086
OpenAlexW4287959252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.