Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881180›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2023

Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions detected in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a post hoc analysis of SORAMIC trial to identify risk factors for progression.

Osman Öcal, Christoph J Zech, Matthias P Fabritius, Christian Loewe, Otto van Delden, Vincent Vandecaveye, Bernhard Gebauer, Thomas Berg, Christian Sengel, Irene Bargellini and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Multidisciplinary experts consensus on diagnosis and treatment of precancerous lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 8 countries.

Osman ÖcalDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christoph J ZechRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Matthias P FabritiusDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christian LoeweSection of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Otto van DeldenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent VandecaveyeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas BergKlinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Sektion Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian SengelRadiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France.
Irene BargelliniDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Roberto IezziFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy.
Alberto BenitoAbdominal Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Maciej PechDepartments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Antonio GasbarriniFondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Bruno SangroLiver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain.
Peter MalfertheinerDepartment of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. max.seidensticker@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITKU Leuven · BELMU Klinikum · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify clinical and imaging parameters associated with progression of non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions during follow-up in patients who received treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

methodsA total of 67 patients with 106 lesions were identified after screening 538 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI within the SORAMIC trial. All patients were allocated to the trial treatment according to the trial scheme, and 61 of 67 patients received systemic treatment with sorafenib (either alone or combined with locoregional therapies) during the trial period. Follow-up images after treatment according to trial scheme were reviewed for subsequent hypervascularization or > 1 cm size increase. The correlation between progression and several imaging and clinical parameters was assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses.

resultsOn a median 178 (range, 48-1072) days follow-up period, progression was encountered in 18 (16.9%) lesions in 12 (17.9%) patients. In univariable analysis size > 12.6 mm (p = 0.070), ECOG-PS (p = 0.025), hypointensity at T1-weighted imaging (p = 0.028), hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging (p < 0.001), hyperintensity at DWI images (p = 0.007), and cirrhosis (p = 0.065) were correlated with progression during follow-up. Hyperintensity at T2 images (p = 0.011) was an independent risk factor for progression in multivariable analysis, as well as cirrhosis (p = 0.033) and ECOG-PS (p = 0.030).

conclusionsNon-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions are associated with subsequent progression after treatment in patients with HCC. T2 hyperintensity, diffusion restriction, cirrhosis, and higher ECOG-PS could identify lesions with increased risk. These factors should be considered for further diagnostic evaluation or treatment of such lesions. KEY POINTS: • Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions have considerable risk of progression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving treatment. • T2 hyperintensity, cirrhosis, ECOG-PS, and hyperintensity at DWI are associated with increased risk of progression. • Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions should be considered in the decision-making process of locoregional therapies, especially in the presence of these risk factors.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsGadolinium DTPAHumansLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsGadolinium DTPAGadoxetic acidHepatobiliary phaseHepatocellular carcinomaHypovascular hypointense lesionsMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35881180
PMCPMC9755078
OpenAlexW4287921722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.