Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35881146›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2022

Alcohol availability during withdrawal gates the impact of alcohol vapor exposure on responses to alcohol cues.

M J Carpio, Runbo Gao, Erica Wooner, Christelle A Cayton, Jocelyn M Richard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M J CarpioDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
Runbo GaoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
Erica WoonerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
Christelle A CaytonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
Jocelyn M RichardDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA. richardj@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-0418

Funding

Glutamatergic basal forebrain neurons in aversion-resistant drinkingR01AA028770 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RICHARD, JOCELYN M · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
Ventral pallidal circuitry in alcohol seeking and reinstatement by stressR00AA025384 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RICHARD, JOCELYN M · 2018 to 2020
$747k
NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA025384NIAAA NIH HHS R00AA025384NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA028770NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA028770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleChronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) vapor inhalation is a widely used model of alcohol dependence, but the impact of CIE on cue-elicited alcohol seeking is poorly understood.

objectiveHere, we assessed the effects of CIE on alcohol-seeking elicited by cues paired with alcohol before or after CIE vapor inhalation.

methodsIn experiment 1, male and female Long-Evans rats were trained in a discriminative stimulus (DS) task, in which one auditory cue (the DS) predicts the availability of 15% ethanol and a control cue (the NS) predicts no ethanol. Rats then underwent CIE or served as controls. Subsets of each group received access to oral ethanol twice a week during acute withdrawal. After CIE, rats were presented with the DS and NS cues under extinction and retraining conditions to determine whether they would alter their responses to these cues. In experiment 2, rats underwent CIE prior to training in the DS task.

resultsCIE enhanced behavioral responses to cues previously paired with alcohol, but only in rats that received access to alcohol during acute withdrawal. When CIE occurred before task training, male rats were slower to develop cue responses and less likely to enter the alcohol port, even though they had received alcohol during acute withdrawal.

conclusionsThese results suggest that CIE vapor inhalation alone does not potentiate the motivational value of alcohol cues but that an increase in cue responses requires alcohol experience during acute withdrawal. Furthermore, under some conditions, CIE may disrupt responses to alcohol-paired cues.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCuesAnimalsAntisocial Personality DisorderEthanolFemaleMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansEthanolAddictionAlcohol dependenceCuesRatSex differencesWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID35881146
PMCPMC9526241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.