ArticleRevista de neurologia2022
Application of neuroendoscopic surgery in treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage.
Article in Revista de neurologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Analysis of the learning curve for neuroendoscopic evacuation of basal ganglia hemorrhage.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Diffusion tensor imaging assessments to investigate motor impairment recovery after minor basal ganglia hemorrhage post-stereotactic surgery.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe influence of Application of neuroendoscopic surgery in treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage remains largely unknown.
aimTo compare the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery (NES) and small bone window craniotomy (SBWC) microsurgery on the treatment of patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage (HBGH). PATIENTS AND
methodsThe clinical data of 174 HBGH patients treated in our hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into minimally invasive NES group (n = 90) and SBWC microsurgery group (n = 84). Their operation time, hematoma clearance rate, rebleeding and prognosis were compared.
resultsIn minimally invasive NES group, the operation time and intraoperative hemostasis time were significantly shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than those in SBWC microsurgery group (p menor de 0.001). The preoperative Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score was 8.64 ± 1.04 points and 8.68 ± 1.02 points respectively in minimally invasive NES group and SBWC microsurgery group (p mayor de 0.05). At 24 h after operation, the GCS score in minimally invasive NES group rose to 12.89 ± 1.56 points, and it had a significant difference from that in SBWC microsurgery group (11.18 ± 1.14 points, p menor de 0.001). The volume of brain edema was 11.82 ± 3.25 mL in minimally invasive NES group and 18.89 ± 3.15 mL in SBWC microsurgery group (p menor de 0.001). In minimally invasive NES group, the clearance of hematoma was superior to that in SBWC microsurgery group, and the prognosis was also better than that in SBWC microsurgery group.
conclusionsMinimally invasive NES has better efficacy than SBWC microsurgery in the treatment of HBGH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.