ArticleDiabetes care2022
Comparing IADPSG and NICE Diagnostic Criteria for GDM in Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.
Article in Diabetes care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal macronutrient intake and gestational diabetes: systematic review of prospective observational studies and dose-response meta-analyses.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prenatal Chromium Exposure and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Integrating Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of LPCAT1 from a Phospholipid Remodeling Perspective.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Combined Effects of Maternal Pre-Pregnancy BMI and OGTT Response Patterns on Early Neurodevelopment in Offspring: A Cohort Study.Journal of diabetes · 2026Article
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes among Chinese women meeting NICE but not IADPSG criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of biomedical research · 2026Article
- Overlap of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-eclampsia: A Scoping Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Identifying serum amino acid as biomarkers of gestational diabetes mellitus in second-trimester among Chinese pregnant women: a machine learning-based cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a model integrating clinical and metabolomic markers for gestational diabetes mellitus prediction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in India: The ICMR-INDIAB national study (ICMR-INDIAB-24).The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between lower fasting plasma glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test and adverse perinatal outcomes: A Chinese cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Mediating effect of osteocalcin underlying the link between insulin-like growth factor-I and gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- The threshold effect of fasting blood glucose levels on the risk of delivering macrosomia in gestational diabetes mellitus patients.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Research Progress of Risk Factors Associated with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Computed Tomography Radiomics Nomogram to Predict the Intraoperative Hypertensive Crisis of Abdominal Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Optimizing gestational diabetes diagnostic criteria to predict adverse perinatal outcomes in the United Arab Emirates: The Mutaba'ah Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Association between AST/ALT ratio and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Korean pregnant women.PloS one · 2025Article
- Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the performance of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) with those endorsed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe performed a secondary data analysis of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study participants in five study centers. Logistic regression analyses were performed, and Akaike information criterion were applied for the comparison of different statistical prediction models. We further analyzed the performance by four racial/ethnic subgroups, namely, Whites, Hispanics, Asians, and Blacks.
resultsAmong all, IADPSG criteria diagnosed 267 (4.1%) more women with GDM, but predicted primary caesarean section (CS) and large for gestational age (LGA) and neonatal adiposity better than did NICE criteria after adjustment for potential confounders. Among Whites, IADPSG criteria diagnosed 65 (2.5%) more subjects with GDM and predicted LGA and neonatal adiposity better, but predicted hypertensive disorders, primary CS and clinical neonatal hypoglycemia worse. Among Hispanics, the IADPSG criteria diagnosed 203 (12.1%) more with GDM but performed better in predicting hypertensive disorders, LGA, neonatal adiposity, and hyperinsulinemia. Among Asians, the IADPSG criteria diagnosed 34 (2.0%) fewer subjects with GDM but predicted hypertensive disorders better in the unadjusted model. In Blacks, IADPSG criteria diagnosed 34 (10.5%) more women with GDM.
conclusionsIADPSG criteria appear to be more favorable than NICE for identification of adverse pregnancy outcomes among Hispanic and Asian women, while they are comparable to NICE among White women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.