Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35880448›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2022

Bladder-sparing (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Noortje Verschoor, Wilma D Heemsbergen, Joost L Boormans, Martine Franckena

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noortje VerschoorDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilma D HeemsbergenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-0729
Joost L BoormansDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martine FranckenaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrgan-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer by maximal transurethral removal of the tumor (TURB) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) has shown promising results in recent studies, and is therefore considered to be an acceptable alternative for the standard of radical cystectomy (RC) in selected patients. We report on outcomes in a single-center, retrospective CRT cohort in comparison to a RC and radiotherapy only (RT) cohort. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe patient population included

resultsBaseline characteristics were different between the treatment groups with in particular worse comorbidity scores and higher age in the RT cohort. The CRT schedule was completed by 96% of the patients. LC at 2 years was 83.4% (90% CI 76.0-90.8) for CRT

conclusionsThe organ-preserving strategy with CRT was feasible and tolerable in this patient population, and the achieved LC and OS were satisfactory in comparison to the RC cohort and literature.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedChemoradiotherapyHumansMusclesNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderBladder cancerbladder conservationlocal controlradiotherapysurvival

Identifiers

PMID35880448
OpenAlexW4287958649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.