Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35880421›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Phylogenomic Analyses of 2,786 Genes in 158 Lineages Support a Root of the Eukaryotic Tree of Life between Opisthokonts and All Other Lineages.

Mario A Cerón-Romero, Miguel M Fonseca, Leonardo de Oliveira Martins, David Posada, Laura A Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Environmental phylogenetics supports a steady diversification of crown eukaryotes starting from the mid-Proterozoic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Challenges in Assembling the Dated Tree of Life.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario A Cerón-RomeroDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.
Miguel M FonsecaCIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Leonardo de Oliveira MartinsDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5247-1320
David PosadaDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1407-3406
Laura A KatzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-4702

Funding

Assessing evolutionary patterns in uncultivable ciliates and their microbiomes by combining single-cell transcriptomics and single-cell genomicsR15HG010409 · NHGRI · SMITH COLLEGE · PI KATZ, LAURA ALINE · 2019 to 2019
$400k
NHGRI NIH HHS R15 HG010409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in phylogenomics and high-throughput sequencing have allowed the reconstruction of deep phylogenetic relationships in the evolution of eukaryotes. Yet, the root of the eukaryotic tree of life remains elusive. The most popular hypothesis in textbooks and reviews is a root between Unikonta (Opisthokonta + Amoebozoa) and Bikonta (all other eukaryotes), which emerged from analyses of a single-gene fusion. Subsequent, highly cited studies based on concatenation of genes supported this hypothesis with some variations or proposed a root within Excavata. However, concatenation of genes does not consider phylogenetically-informative events like gene duplications and losses. A recent study using gene tree parsimony (GTP) suggested the root lies between Opisthokonta and all other eukaryotes, but only including 59 taxa and 20 genes. Here we use GTP with a duplication-loss model in a gene-rich and taxon-rich dataset (i.e., 2,786 gene families from two sets of 155 and 158 diverse eukaryotic lineages) to assess the root, and we iterate each analysis 100 times to quantify tree space uncertainty. We also contrasted our results and discarded alternative hypotheses from the literature using GTP and the likelihood-based method SpeciesRax. Our estimates suggest a root between Fungi or Opisthokonta and all other eukaryotes; but based on further analysis of genome size, we propose that the root between Opisthokonta and all other eukaryotes is the most likely.

Indexed as

EukaryotaEukaryotic CellsGuanosine TriphosphateLikelihood FunctionsPhylogenyGuanosine Triphosphategene duplicationgene lossgene tree parsimonygene tree–species tree reconciliationmaximum likelihoodphylogenomicsroot of eukaryotes

Identifiers

PMID35880421
PMCPMC9366629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.