Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35880180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Exploring the Potential of Exosome-Related LncRNA Pairs as Predictors for Immune Microenvironment, Survival Outcome, and Microbiotain Landscape in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Fangchao Zhao, Zhirong Li, Zefang Dong, Zengying Wang, Pengfei Guo, Dengfeng Zhang, Shujun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Exosomes in esophageal cancer: function and therapeutic prospects.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fangchao ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zhirong LiClinical Laboratory Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zefang DongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zengying WangSchool of Clinical Medicine of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Pengfei GuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Dengfeng ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Shujun LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating studies have demonstrated the indispensable roles of exosomes and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer progression and the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the clinical relevance of exosome-related lncRNAs (ER-lncRNAs) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. Three subtypes were identified by consensus clustering of 3459 valid ER-lncRNA pairs, of which subtype A is preferentially related to favorable prognosis, lower stromal and immune scores, and higher tumor purity scores. Higher immune cell infiltration, higher mRNA levels of immune checkpoints, higher stromal and immune scores, and lower tumor purity were found in subtype C, which presented a poor prognosis. We developed a prognostic risk score model based on 8 ER-lncRNA pairs in the GEO cohort using univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO Cox regression analysis. Patients were divided into a high risk-score group and low risk-score group by the cut-off values of the 1-year ROC curves in the training set (GEO cohort) and the validation set (TCGA cohort). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Decision curve analysis (DCA), clinical correlation analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression all confirmed that the prognostic model has good predictive power and that the risk score can be used as an independent prognostic factor in different cohorts. By further analyzing the TME based on the risk model, higher immune cell infiltration and more active TME were found in the high-risk group, which presented a poor prognosis. Patients with high risk scores also exhibited higher mRNA levels of immune checkpoints and lower IC50 values, indicating that these patients may be more prone to profit from chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The top five most abundant microbial phyla in ESCC was also identified. The best ER-lncRNAs (AC082651.3, AP000487.1, PLA2G4E-AS1, C8orf49 and AL356056.2) were identified based on machine learning algorithms. Subsequently, the expression levels of the above ER-lncRNAs were analyzed by combining the GTEx and TCGA databases. In addition, qRT-PCR analysis based on clinical samples from our hospital showed a high degree of consistency. This study fills the gap of ER-lncRNA model in predicting the prognosis of patients with ESCC and the risk score-based risk stratification could facilitate the determination of therapeutic option to improve prognoses.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaExosomesRNA, Long NoncodingHumansRNA, MessengerTumor MicroenvironmentRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Messengeresophageal squamous cell carcinomaexosomelong non-coding RNAprognostic modeltumor immune microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35880180
PMCPMC9307964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.