Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35880092›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Lung Cancer Stage Prediction Using Multi-Omics Data.

Wei Li, Binchun Liu, Weiqian Wang, Can Sun, Jianpeng Che, Xuelian Yuan, Chunbo Zhai

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Retracted: Lung Cancer Stage Prediction Using Multi-Omics Data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei LiSecond Ward, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, China.
Binchun LiuSecond Ward, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, China.
Weiqian WangSecond Ward, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, China.
Can SunSecond Ward, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, China.
Jianpeng CheSecond Ward, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, China.
Xuelian YuanQingdao Geneis Institute of Big Data Mining and Precision Medicine, Qingdao 266000, China.
Chunbo ZhaiSecond Ward, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0104-8658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. Patients with early-stage lung cancer can be treated by surgery, while patients in the middle and late stages need chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Therefore, accurate staging of lung cancer is crucial for doctors to formulate accurate treatment plans for patients. In this paper, the random forest algorithm is used as the lung cancer stage prediction model, and the accuracy of lung cancer stage prediction is discussed in the microbiome, transcriptome, microbe, and transcriptome fusion groups, and the accuracy of the model is measured by indicators such as ACC, recall, and precision. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of microbial combinatorial transcriptome fusion analysis was the highest, reaching 0.809. The study reveals the role of multimodal data and fusion algorithm in accurately diagnosing lung cancer stage, which could aid doctors in clinics.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasm StagingTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID35880092
PMCPMC9308511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.