Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35880038›Full record

ArticleStochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal2023

Flood vulnerability of a few areas in the foothills of the Western Ghats: a comparison of AHP and F-AHP models.

Chandini P C Senan, R S Ajin, Jean Homian Danumah, Romulus Costache, Alireza Arabameri, A Rajaneesh, K S Sajinkumar, Sekhar L Kuriakose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chandini P C SenanKerala State Emergency Operations Centre (KSEOC), Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA), Thiruvananthapuram, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-5908
R S AjinKerala State Emergency Operations Centre (KSEOC), Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA), Thiruvananthapuram, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3073-4390
Jean Homian DanumahCentre Universitaire de Recherche Et d'Application en Télédétection (CURAT), Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.ORCID 0000-0003-3033-4274
Romulus CostacheNational Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6876-8572
Alireza ArabameriDepartment of Geomorphology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
A RajaneeshDepartment of Geology, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0732-5046
K S SajinkumarDepartment of Geology, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6461-8112
Sekhar L KuriakoseKerala State Emergency Operations Centre (KSEOC), Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA), Thiruvananthapuram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flooding is one of the most destructive natural catastrophes that can strike anywhere in the world. With the recent, but frequent catastrophic flood events that occurred in the narrow stretch of land in southern India, sandwiched between the Western Ghats and the Arabian Sea, this study was initiated. The goal of this research is to identify flood-vulnerable zones in this area by making the local self governing bodies as the mapping unit. This study also assessed the predictive accuracy of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process (F-AHP) models. A total of 20 indicators (nine physical-environmental variables and 11 socio-economic variables) have been considered for the vulnerability modelling. Flood-vulnerability maps, created using remotely sensed satellite data and geographic information systems, was divided into five zones. AHP and F-AHP flood vulnerability models identified 12.29% and 11.81% of the area as very high-vulnerable zones, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to validate these flood vulnerability maps. The flood vulnerable maps, created using the AHP and F-AHP methods, were found to be outstanding based on the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values. This demonstrates the effectiveness of these two models. The results of AUC for the AHP and F-AHP models were 0.946 and 0.943, respectively, articulating that the AHP model is more efficient than its chosen counterpart in demarcating the flood vulnerable zones. Decision-makers and land-use planners will find the generated vulnerable zone maps useful, particularly in implementing flood mitigation plans.

Indexed as

FloodingKeralaPhysico-environmental vulnerabilitySocio-economic vulnerabilityWestern Ghats

Identifiers

PMID35880038
PMCPMC9298175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.