Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879953›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022

The Effect of Customized and Silicon Insoles on Mid- and Hindfoot in Adult Flexible Pes Planovalgus.

Amit Kumar Vimal, Shivani Sharma, Bindu Gahlawat, G Pandian, Sumit Sural

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A foot structure study of new arch flexibility grading system based on three-dimensional arch volume.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit Kumar Vimal *Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons With Physical Disabilities (Divyangjan), 4-Vishnu Digambar Marg, New Delhi, 110002 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-3225
Shivani Sharma *Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons With Physical Disabilities (Divyangjan), 4-Vishnu Digambar Marg, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Bindu GahlawatStudent at Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons With Physical Disabilities (Divyangjan), New Delhi, 110002, India.
G PandianDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthetics, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons With Physical Disabilities (Divyangjan), 4-Vishnu Digambar Marg, New Delhi, 110002 India.
Sumit SuralDepartment of Orthopedic, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Flexible flat foot or pes planovalgus is a common foot deformity, and silicone and customized insole are commonly used as a non-operative treatment modality of flexible planovalgus. However, there are inadequate data and limited evidence available regarding the immediate effects of their use in midfoot and hindfoot of adults. The aim of this study is to quantify and compare the radiological parameters immediately on weightbearing with silicon and customized insoles and without them to assess the effect on midfoot and hindfoot of the flexible planovalgus in adults. Methods: A total number of 11 (8 females and 3 males) subjects with flexible pes planovalgus deformity without any other foot deformity were included in the study. Each patient was assessed three times in a random sequence without and with use of either silicon insoles or customized insole. The radiographic parameters without insole, with silicon insole, and with customized insole conditions were calculated using online available computer software Kinovea. Results: One-way ANOVA analysis was performed between groups (without insole, with silicone insole and with customized insole). The hindfoot parameters depicted that calcaneal inclination angle (CIA) was significant increased ( Conclusion: The results imply that the compressibility of the insole material affects the forefoot and hindfoot biomechanics differently. This study concludes that silicone insole affects only the midfoot which bears 45% of bodyweight and customized insole affects both midfoot and more importantly the hindfoot which bears 55% of bodyweight.

Indexed as

Customized insoleFlat footPes planusSilicon insole

Identifiers

PMID35879953
PMCPMC9299753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.