Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879940›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics

Is there any clinical significance of axillary nerve electrophysiological changes in the deltoid split approach?

Utku Gurhan, Ahmet Ozgur Yildirim, Ibrahim Alper Yavuz, Fatma Gul Yurdakul, Esra Civgin, Kaan Erler, Erman Ceyhan, Filiz Sivas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Utku GurhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kyrenia, KKTC Kyrenia, Mersin 10, Turkey.
Ahmet Ozgur YildirimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Health Sciences University Ankara City Hospital Üniversiteler, 06800, Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey.
Ibrahim Alper YavuzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Health Sciences University Eskişehir City Hospital, Turkey.
Fatma Gul YurdakulDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University Ankara City Hospital Üniversiteler, 06800 Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey.
Esra CivginDepartment of Radiology, Health Sciences University Ankara City Hospital Üniversiteler, 06800, Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey.
Kaan ErlerDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Near East University Hospital, KKTC Nicosia, Mersin 10, Turkey.
Erman CeyhanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Health Sciences University Ankara City Hospital Üniversiteler, 06800, Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey.
Filiz SivasDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University Ankara City Hospital Üniversiteler, 06800 Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey.
Çankaya University · TREskişehir City Hospital · TRNear East University · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical effects of axillary nerve injury in the deltoid splitting approach are controversial. This study investigated the axillary nerve function with clinical and electrophysiologically in proximal humeral fracture patients with internal fixation using the deltoid split approach. We also aimed to investigate the effects of this damage on deltoid muscle volume and discuss the effects of volumetric changes and nerve damage on patients' clinical outcomes. Methods: study designed prospectively with 25 consecutive patients who received open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture through a deltoid splitting approach. We performed clinical, electrophysiological, and radiological examinations during minimum follow-up time of 24 months. Electrophysiological examination comprised electromyoneurography (EMNG). Functional results followed by Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Deltoid volumes were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Twenty-five patients operated on with open reduction internal fixation were prospectively observed. In the EMNG measurements of the patients on the 45th postoperative day, partial degeneration was observed in the anterior part of the axillary nerve in all cases (100%). In the control EMNG measurements performed at the 12th month, normal values were obtained for 15 (60%) of the patients, while findings of ongoing regeneration were detected for 10 (40%) of the patients and normal values at all patients at the 24th month. The difference between abnormal and normal EMNG groups' on 12th month Constant-Murley scores was not statistically significant in any period. Only anterior muscle thickness was statistically higher in the normal patient group than with abnormal EMNG results. Conclusions: In proximal humeral fractures treated with the deltoid split approach, there may be iatrogenic damage of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. Axillary nerve damage does not affect the patients' clinical scores in the early and mid-terms. Level of evidence: LEVEL III.

Indexed as

Axillary nerve injuryDeltoid volumeLateral deltoid splitting approachProximal humerus fracture

Identifiers

PMID35879940
PMCPMC9307494
OpenAlexW4285045825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.