Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879938›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022

Dose-volume analysis of planned versus accumulated dose as a predictor for late gastrointestinal toxicity in men receiving radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Ashley L K Ong, Kellie Knight, Vanessa Panettieri, Mathew Dimmock, Jeffrey K L Tuan, Hong Qi Tan, Caroline Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashley L K OngNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, Singapore.
Kellie KnightMonash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Clayton, Australia.
Vanessa PanettieriMonash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Clayton, Australia.
Mathew DimmockMonash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Clayton, Australia.
Jeffrey K L TuanNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, Singapore.
Hong Qi TanNational Cancer Centre Singapore, Division of Radiation Oncology, Singapore.
Caroline WrightMonash University, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Clayton, Australia.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGMonash University · AUAlfred Health · AUKeele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Significant dose deviations have been reported between planned (D Materials and methods: Dose volume (DV) metrics were compared between D Results: Rectal D Conclusions: The dosimetric impact of a higher dose rectal dose in D

Indexed as

Accumulated doseGastrointestinal toxicityHigh-risk prostatePredictive modelVolumetric image-guidance

Identifiers

PMID35879938
PMCPMC9307677
OpenAlexW4285678420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.