ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022
A cross-sectional study of the preventive health care activities of western Canadian rural-living patients unattached to primary care providers.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in Preventive Care Uptake in Attached and Unattached Rural-Living Residents.Health promotion practice · 2026Article
- Barriers to Accessing Vascular Surgery in Northern, Rural, and Remote Canadian Communities.CJC open · 2026Review
- Primary care unattachment: impact on mortality, hospitalizations and costs.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Accessibility of Ontario pharmacies offering COVID-19 vaccination by rurality, community material deprivation, and ethnic concentration: a repeated cross-sectional geospatial analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Understanding the experience of clinicians and non-clinical staff in Integrated Virtual Care, a hybrid primary care program in rural Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessing patient experiences with a Virtual Triage and Assessment Centre (VTAC): a mixed-methods study using an online survey and semi-structured interviews in Renfrew County, Ontario.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Impact of changes in primary care attachment: a scoping review.Family medicine and community health · 2025Article
- The healthcare experiences of rural-living Canadians with and without a primary care provider: a qualitative analysis of open-ended cross-sectional survey responses.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Sustainable implementation of a frailty education program for formal health care providers.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Generating user-driven patient personas to support preventive health care activities of rural-living unattached patients.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Care-seeking experiences of unattached patients in the Canadian health care system: Qualitative study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevention services, such as screening tests and vaccination, are underutilized, especially by rural populations and patients without a usual primary care provider. Little is known about the compounding impacts on preventive care of being unattached and living in a rural area and there has been no comprehensive exploration of this highly vulnerable population's prevention activities. The twofold purpose of this research was to examine rural unattached patients' prevention activity self-efficacy and completion and to explore their experiences accessing healthcare, including COVID-19 impacts. Two thirds of patients had been unattached for over one year, and over 20 % had been unattached for over 5 years; males experienced longer unattachment compared to females. Completion rates of prevention activities were relatively low, ranging from 5.9 % (alcohol screening) to 59 % (vision test). Most participants did not complete their prevention care activities in line with the Lifetime Prevention Schedule timeline: 65 % of participants had less than half of their activities up-to-date and only 6.7 % of participants were up to date on 75 % or more of their prevention activities. Participants with higher prevention self-efficacy scores were more likely to be up-to-date on associated prevention activities but the longer patients had been unattached, the fewer their up-to-date prevention activities. Patients expressed negative impacts of COVID-19 including walk-in clinics shutting down limiting access to care. These results suggest serious gaps in rural unattached patients' preventive care and highlight the need for support when they are without a usual primary care provider, which can be lengthy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.