Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879934›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

A cross-sectional study of the preventive health care activities of western Canadian rural-living patients unattached to primary care providers.

Kathy L Rush, Lindsay Burton, Cherisse L Seaton, Mindy A Smith, Eric P H Li, Charlene E Ronquillo, Khalad Hasan, Selena Davis, Mona Mattei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of changes in primary care attachment: a scoping review.Family medicine and community health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathy L RushSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Lindsay BurtonSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Cherisse L SeatonSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
Mindy A SmithPatient Voices Network, British Columbia, Canada and Department of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Eric P H LiFaculty of Management and Principal's Research Chair (Tier 2) in Social Innovation for Health Equity and Food Security, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada.
Charlene E RonquilloPatient Voices Network, British Columbia, Canada and Department of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Khalad HasanDepartment of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Canada.
Selena DavisDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mona MatteiDivision of Family Practice, Kootenay Boundary, Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention services, such as screening tests and vaccination, are underutilized, especially by rural populations and patients without a usual primary care provider. Little is known about the compounding impacts on preventive care of being unattached and living in a rural area and there has been no comprehensive exploration of this highly vulnerable population's prevention activities. The twofold purpose of this research was to examine rural unattached patients' prevention activity self-efficacy and completion and to explore their experiences accessing healthcare, including COVID-19 impacts. Two thirds of patients had been unattached for over one year, and over 20 % had been unattached for over 5 years; males experienced longer unattachment compared to females. Completion rates of prevention activities were relatively low, ranging from 5.9 % (alcohol screening) to 59 % (vision test). Most participants did not complete their prevention care activities in line with the Lifetime Prevention Schedule timeline: 65 % of participants had less than half of their activities up-to-date and only 6.7 % of participants were up to date on 75 % or more of their prevention activities. Participants with higher prevention self-efficacy scores were more likely to be up-to-date on associated prevention activities but the longer patients had been unattached, the fewer their up-to-date prevention activities. Patients expressed negative impacts of COVID-19 including walk-in clinics shutting down limiting access to care. These results suggest serious gaps in rural unattached patients' preventive care and highlight the need for support when they are without a usual primary care provider, which can be lengthy.

Indexed as

HealthcarePreventionRuralScreeningUnattached patients

Identifiers

PMID35879934
PMCPMC9300582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.