Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879835›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2023

The diagnostic value of exosomal circular RNAs in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yang Zhang, Xuyang Yang, Zixuan Zhuang, Mingtian Wei, Wenjian Meng, Xiangbing Deng, Ziqiang Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. CircRNAs: versatile players and new targets in organ fibrosis.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-0028
Xuyang YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Zixuan ZhuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Mingtian WeiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Wenjian MengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Xiangbing DengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Ziqiang WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-1535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, serum exosomal circular RNAs (circRNAs) were applied to discriminate cancer patients from healthy individuals, indicating that exosomal circRNAs have the potential to be novel biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. This study aims to summarize the role of exosomal circRNAs in cancer diagnosis by a meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted up to July 2021 in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database. To evaluate the diagnostic value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were pooled. Threshold effect followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of this meta-analysis model. Fagan plots and likelihood ratio scattergrams were used to explore the potential clinical significance.

resultsTen eligible studies with 514 controls and 557 patients were included in this diagnostic meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.83), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.89), 5.87 (95% CI, 3.67-9.38), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.40), and 21.15 (95% CI, 10.25-43.68), respectively. The AUC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91). Sensitivity analysis showed that four studies had an impact on the pooled results and mainly contributed to the heterogeneity. Fagan's nomogram revealed that the prior probability of 20%, the post probability positive, the post probability negative were 59% and 6%, respectively.

conclusionOur results suggested that exosomal circRNAs might serve as powerful biomarkers in detecting cancers with high sensitivity and specificity. However, more well-designed and multicenter diagnostic tests are needed to validate our results.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRNA, CircularBiomarkers, TumorHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Circularcancercircular RNAsdiagnosisexosomesmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35879835
PMCPMC9883561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.