Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879817›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2022

Automating reflectance confocal microscopy image analysis for dermatological research: a review.

Imane Lboukili, Georgios Stamatas, Xavier Descombes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Non-Invasive Imaging in Post-Radiotherapy Monitoring of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  4. Characteristics and differential diagnosis of common verrucous proliferative skin diseases under dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Diagnostic value of reflectance confocal microscopy in papular dermatoses of the female vulva.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Age-dependent changes in epidermal architecture explored using an automated image analysis algorithm on in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy images.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imane LboukiliJohnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France, Paris, France, France.
Georgios StamatasJohnson & Johnson Santé Beauté France, Paris, France, France.
Xavier DescombesUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRIA, I3S/CNRS, Nice, Antibes, France, France.
Johnson & Johnson (France) · FRCentre de Recherche en Informatique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceReflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a noninvasive, in vivo technology that offers near histopathological resolution at the cellular level. It is useful in the study of phenomena for which obtaining a biopsy is impractical or would cause unnecessary tissue damage and trauma to the patient.

aimThis review covers the use of RCM in the study of skin and the use of machine learning to automate information extraction. It has two goals: (1) an overview of information provided by RCM on skin structure and how it changes over time in response to stimuli and in disease and (2) an overview of machine learning approaches developed to automate the extraction of key morphological features from RCM images. APPROACH: A PubMed search was conducted with additional literature obtained from references lists.

resultsThe application of RCM as an in vivo tool in dermatological research and the biologically relevant information derived from it are presented. Algorithms for image classification to epidermal layers, delineation of the dermal-epidermal junction, classification of skin lesions, and demarcation of individual cells within an image, all important factors in the makeup of the skin barrier, were reviewed. Application of image analysis methods in RCM is hindered by low image quality due to noise and/or poor contrast. Use of supervised machine learning is limited by time-consuming manual labeling of RCM images.

conclusionsRCM has great potential in the study of skin structures. The use of artificial intelligence could enable an easier, more reproducible, precise, and rigorous study of RCM images for the understanding of skin structures, skin barrier, and skin inflammation and lesions. Although several attempts have been made, further work is still needed to provide a definite gold standard and overcome issues related to image quality, limited labeled datasets, and lack of phenotype variability in available databases.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEpidermisHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalSkincell demarcationdermal–epidermal junction delineationepidermal layer classificationepidermismachine learningreflectance confocal microscopyskinskin lesions

Identifiers

PMID35879817
PMCPMC9309100
OpenAlexW4287010450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.