Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879803›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2022

Preadmission assessment of extended length of hospital stay with RFECV-ETC and hospital-specific data.

Chinedu I Ossai, David Rankin, Nilmini Wickramasinghe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chinedu I OssaiSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Biostatistics, Swinburne University, John Street Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, Australia. cossai@swin.edu.au.
David RankinCabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Nilmini WickramasingheSchool of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Biostatistics, Swinburne University, John Street Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, Australia.
Swinburne University of Technology · AUCabrini Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who exceed their expected length of stay in the hospital come at a cost to stakeholders in the healthcare sector as bed spaces are limited for new patients, nosocomial infections increase and the outcome for many patients is hampered due to multimorbidity after hospitalization.

objectivesThis paper develops a technique for predicting Extended Length of Hospital Stay (ELOHS) at preadmission and their risk factors using hospital data.

methodsA total of 91,468 records of patient's hospital information from a private acute teaching hospital were used for developing a machine learning algorithm relaying on Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation and Extra Tree Classifier (RFECV-ETC). The study implemented Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and tenfold cross-validation to determine the optimal features for predicting ELOHS while relying on multivariate Logistic Regression (LR) for computing the risk factors and the Relative Risk (RR) of ELOHS at a 95% confidence level.

resultsAn estimated 11.54% of the patients have ELOHS, which increases with patient age as patients < 18 years, 18-40 years, 40-65 years and ≥ 65 years, respectively, have 2.57%, 4.33%, 8.1%, and 15.18% ELOHS rates. The RFECV-ETC algorithm predicted preadmission ELOHS to an accuracy of 89.3%. Age is a predominant risk factors of ELOHS with patients who are > 90 years-PAG (> 90) {RR: 1.85 (1.34-2.56), P:  < 0.001} having 6.23% and 23.3%, respectively, higher likelihood of ELOHS than patient 80-90 years old-PAG (80-90) {RR: 1.74 (1.34-2.38), P:  < 0.001} and those 70-80 years old-PAG (70-80) {RR: 1.5 (1.1-2.05), P: 0.011}. Those from admission category-ADC (US1) {RR: 3.64 (3.09-4.28, P:  < 0.001} are 14.8% and 70.5%, respectively, more prone to ELOHS compared to ADC (UC1) {RR: 3.17 (2.82-3.55), P:  < 0.001} and ADC (EMG) {RR: 2.11 (1.93-2.31), P:  < 0.001}. Patients from SES (low) {RR: 1.45 (1.24-1.71), P:  < 0.001)} are 13.3% and 45% more susceptible to those from SES (middle) and SES (high). Admission type (ADT) such as AS2, M2, NEWS, S2 and others {RR: 1.37-2.77 (1.25-6.19), P:  < 0.001} also have a high likelihood of contributing to ELOHS while the distance to hospital (DTH) {RR: 0.64-0.75 (0.56-0.82), P:  < 0.001}, Charlson Score (CCI) {RR: 0.31-0.68 (0.22-0.99), P:  < 0.001-0.043} and some VMO specialties {RR: 0.08-0.69 (0.03-0.98), P:  < 0.001-0.035} have limited influence on ELOHS.

conclusionsRelying on the preadmission assessment of ELOHS helps identify those patients who are susceptible to exceeding their expected length of stay on admission, thus, making it possible to improve patients' management and outcomes.

Indexed as

HospitalizationHospitalsAdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overHumansLength of StayRisk FactorsAdmission riskExtended length of hospital stayExtra tree classifierMultivariate logistic regressionRecursive feature elimination

Identifiers

PMID35879803
PMCPMC9310419
OpenAlexW4287092012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.