ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2022
Landscape scale ecology of Tetracladium spp. fungal root endophytes.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainable synthesis of mono-, bi- and tri-metallic nanoparticles using endophytic fungi: characterization and different applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Shifts in Rhizosphere and Bulk Soil Microbial Communities During the Second and Third Years of Ginseng Cultivation.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Fungi without borders: cross-ecosystem decomposition of riparian leaf litter.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Genomic insights into the ecological versatility of Tetracladium spp.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Ecological mechanisms of microbial assembly in clonal plantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Needle in a Haystack: Culturing Plant-Beneficial Helotiales Lineages From Plant Roots.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Diurnal Rhythmicity in the Rhizosphere Microbiome-Mechanistic Insights and Significance for Rhizosphere Function.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Review
- Regional scale diversity and distribution of soil inhabiting Tetracladium.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Combating wheat yellow mosaic virus through microbial interactions and hormone pathway modulations.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Fungal and bacterial communities and their associations in snow-free and snow covered (sub-)alpine Pinus cembra forest soils.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Study of the Bacterial, Fungal, and Archaeal Communities Structures near the Bulgarian Antarctic Research Base "St. Kliment Ohridski" on Livingston Island, Antarctica.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Temporal patterns of endophytic microbial heterogeneity across distinct ecological compartments within theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- The effect of plant compartment and geographical location on shaping microbiome of Pulsatilla chinensis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Different Geographic Strains of DinoflagellateInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Influence of cultivation duration on microbial taxa aggregation inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe genus Tetracladium De Wild. (Ascomycota) has been traditionally regarded as a group of Ingoldian fungi or aquatic hyphomycetes-a polyphyletic group of phylogenetically diverse fungi which grow on decaying leaves and plant litter in streams. Recent sequencing evidence has shown that Tetracladium spp. may also exist as root endophytes in terrestrial environments, and furthermore may have beneficial effects on the health and growth of their host. However, the diversity of Tetracladium spp. communities in terrestrial systems and the factors which shape their distribution are largely unknown.
resultsUsing a fungal community internal transcribed spacer amplicon dataset from 37 UK Brassica napus fields we found that soils contained diverse Tetracladium spp., most of which represent previously uncharacterised clades. The two most abundant operational taxonomic units (OTUs), related to previously described aquatic T. furcatum and T. maxilliforme, were enriched in roots relative to bulk and rhizosphere soil. For both taxa, relative abundance in roots, but not rhizosphere or bulk soil was correlated with B. napus yield. The relative abundance of T. furcatum and T. maxilliforme OTUs across compartments showed very similar responses with respect to agricultural management practices and soil characteristics. The factors shaping the relative abundance of OTUs homologous to T. furcatum and T. maxilliforme OTUs in roots were assessed using linear regression and structural equation modelling. Relative abundance of T. maxilliforme and T. furcatum in roots increased with pH, concentrations of phosphorus, and increased rotation frequency of oilseed rape. It decreased with increased soil water content, concentrations of extractable phosphorus, chromium, and iron.
conclusionsThe genus Tetracladium as a root colonising endophyte is a diverse and widely distributed part of the oilseed rape microbiome that positively correlates to crop yield. The main drivers of its community composition are crop management practices and soil nutrients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.