Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879651›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Integrated structure-based protein interface prediction.

M Walder, E Edelstein, M Carroll, S Lazarev, J E Fajardo, A Fiser, R Viswanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computational prediction of multiple antigen epitopes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Assessing the functional impact of protein binding site definition.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M WalderDepartment of Chemistry, Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, 10033, USA.
E EdelsteinDepartment of Chemistry, Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, 10033, USA.
M CarrollDepartment of Chemistry, Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, 10033, USA.
S LazarevDepartment of Chemistry, Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, 10033, USA.
J E FajardoDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
A FiserDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
R ViswanathanDepartment of Chemistry, Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, 10033, USA. raji@yu.edu.

Funding

Molecular basis of recognition in the Immunological SynapseR35GM136357 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FISER, ANDRAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
Interdisciplinary protein engineering approach to design high affinity antibodies for flavivirusesR01AI141816 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI FISER, ANDRAS · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141816NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136357Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health GM136357 and AI141816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying protein interfaces can inform how proteins interact with their binding partners, uncover the regulatory mechanisms that control biological functions and guide the development of novel therapeutic agents. A variety of computational approaches have been developed for predicting a protein's interfacial residues from its known sequence and structure. Methods using the known three-dimensional structures of proteins can be template-based or template-free. Template-based methods have limited success in predicting interfaces when homologues with known complex structures are not available to use as templates. The prediction performance of template-free methods that only rely only upon proteins' intrinsic properties is limited by the amount of biologically relevant features that can be included in an interface prediction model.

resultsWe describe the development of an integrated method for protein interface prediction (ISPIP) to explore the hypothesis that the efficacy of a computational prediction method of protein binding sites can be enhanced by using a combination of methods that rely on orthogonal structure-based properties of a query protein, combining and balancing both template-free and template-based features. ISPIP is a method that integrates these approaches through simple linear or logistic regression models and more complex decision tree models. On a diverse test set of 156 query proteins, ISPIP outperforms each of its individual classifiers in identifying protein binding interfaces.

conclusionsThe integrated method captures the best performance of individual classifiers and delivers an improved interface prediction. The method is robust and performs well even when one of the individual classifiers performs poorly on a particular query protein. This work demonstrates that integrating orthogonal methods that depend on different structural properties of proteins performs better at interface prediction than any individual classifier alone.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsInterface predictionProtein–protein interactionStructure-based method

Identifiers

PMID35879651
PMCPMC9316365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.