Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879649›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Deep learning as a novel method for endoscopic diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis: a prospective nested case-control study.

Quchuan Zhao, Qing Jia, Tianyu Chi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Premalignant Lesions.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quchuan ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Chang-chun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
Qing JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 5 North Court Street, Beijing, 100053, China. jiaqing_hosp@163.com.
Tianyu ChiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, 45 Chang-chun Street, Beijing, 100053, China. xiaoyu800524.student@sina.com.
Capital Medical University · CNGuang’anmen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsChronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is a precancerous disease that often leads to the development of gastric cancer (GC) and is positively correlated with GC morbidity. However, the sensitivity of the endoscopic diagnosis of CAG is only 42%. Therefore, we developed a real-time video monitoring model for endoscopic diagnosis of CAG based on U-Net deep learning (DL) and conducted a prospective nested case-control study to evaluate the diagnostic evaluation indices of the model and its consistency with pathological diagnosis.

methodsOur cohort consisted of 1539 patients undergoing gastroscopy from December 1, 2020, to July 1, 2021. Based on pathological diagnosis, patients in the cohort were divided into the CAG group or the chronic nonatrophic gastritis (CNAG) group, and we assessed the diagnostic evaluation indices of this model and its consistency with pathological diagnosis after propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize selection bias in the study.

resultsAfter matching, the diagnostic evaluation indices and consistency evaluation of the model were better than those of endoscopists [sensitivity (84.02% vs. 62.72%), specificity (97.04% vs. 81.95%), positive predictive value (96.60% vs. 77.66%), negative predictive value (85.86% vs. 68.73%), accuracy rate (90.53% vs. 72.34%), Youden index (81.06% vs. 44.67%), odd product (172.5 vs. 7.64), positive likelihood ratio (28.39 vs. 3.47), negative likelihood ratio (0.16 vs. 0.45), AUC (95% CI) [0.909 (0.884-0.934) vs. 0.740 (0.702-0.778)] and Kappa (0.852 vs. 0.558)].

conclusionsOur prospective nested case-control study proved that the diagnostic evaluation indices and consistency evaluation of the real-time video monitoring model for endoscopic diagnosis of CAG based on U-Net DL were superior to those of endoscopists. Trial registration ChiCTR2100044458 , 18/03/2020.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGastritis, AtrophicStomach NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesGastroscopyHumansProspective StudiesArtificial intelligenceChronic atrophic gastritisDeep learningGastroscopyU-Net

Identifiers

PMID35879649
PMCPMC9310473
OpenAlexW4287147561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.