Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879593›Full record

SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2023

The role of valence, arousal, stimulus type, and temporal paradigm in the effect of emotion on time perception: A meta-analysis.

Xiaobing Cui, Yu Tian, Li Zhang, Yang Chen, Youling Bai, Dan Li, Jinping Liu, Philip Gable, Huazhan Yin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural Representation of Episodic Time.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The effect of aging and emotions on time processing.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaobing CuiCognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China.
Yu TianInstitute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 610066, China.
Li ZhangCognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China.
Yang ChenCognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China.
Youling BaiCognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China.
Dan LiCognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China.
Jinping LiuHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing and Language Information Processing, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China.
Philip GableDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Huazhan YinCognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, China. yinhuazhan1979@sina.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31671125Social Science Planning Project of Sichuan Province SC21C054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anecdotal experiences show that the human perception of time is subjective, and changes with one's emotional state. Over the past 25 years, increasing empirical evidence has demonstrated that emotions distort time perception and usually result in overestimation. Yet, some inconsistencies deserve clarification. Specifically, it remains controversial how valence (positive/negative), arousal (high/low), stimulus type (scenic picture/facial expression/word/sound), and temporal paradigm (reproduction/estimation/discrimination) modulate the effect of emotion on time perception. Thus, the current study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to quantify evidence for these moderators. After searching the Web of Science, SpiScholar, and Google Scholar, 95 effect sizes from 31 empirical studies were calculated using Hedges'g. The included studies involved 3,776 participants. The results a highlighted significant moderating effect of valence, arousal, stimulus type, and temporal paradigm. Specifically, negative valence tends to result in overestimation relative to positive valence; the increasing arousal leads to increasing temporal dilating; scenic picture, facial picture, and sound are more effective in inducing distortions than word; the overestimation can be better observed by discrimination and estimation paradigms relative to reproduction paradigms, and estimation paradigm is likely to be the most effective. These results suggest that the effect of emotion on time perception is influenced by valence, arousal, stimulus type, and temporal paradigm. These mitigating factors should be considered by scientists when studying time perception.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionArousalEmotionsFacial ExpressionHumansSoundArousalEmotional temporal distortionMeta-analysisStimulus typeTemporal paradigmValence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.