ArticlePsychological research2023
Working memory control predicts fixation duration in scene-viewing.
Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redistribution of Gaze Patterns in Facial Localized Scleroderma Following Autologous Fat Transfer: An Eye-Tracking Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Observational
- Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Eye movements as predictors of student experiences during nursing simulation learning events.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- User Experience Study of the Patient Monitoring Systems Based on Usability Testing and Eye Tracking.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Openness to experience predicts eye movement behavior during scene viewing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- An updating-based working memory load alters the dynamics of eye movements but not their spatial extent during free viewing of natural scenes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Mammals Achieve Common Neural Coverage of Visual Scenes Using Distinct Sampling Behaviors.eNeuro · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When viewing scenes, observers differ in how long they linger at each fixation location and how far they move their eyes between fixations. What factors drive these differences in eye-movement behaviors? Previous work suggests individual differences in working memory capacity may influence fixation durations and saccade amplitudes. In the present study, participants (N = 98) performed two scene-viewing tasks, aesthetic judgment and memorization, while viewing 100 photographs of real-world scenes. Working memory capacity, working memory processing ability, and fluid intelligence were assessed with an operation span task, a memory updating task, and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, respectively. Across participants, we found significant effects of task on both fixation durations and saccade amplitudes. At the level of each individual participant, we also found a significant relationship between memory updating task performance and participants' fixation duration distributions. However, we found no effect of fluid intelligence and no effect of working memory capacity on fixation duration or saccade amplitude distributions, inconsistent with previous findings. These results suggest that the ability to flexibly maintain and update working memory is strongly related to fixation duration behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.