ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Investigation of variation factors in EMG measurement of swallowing: instruction can improve EMG reproducibility.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements and Challenges in Non-Invasive Sensor Technologies for Swallowing Assessment: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Variability in quantitative outcomes of instrumental swallowing assessments in adults: a scoping review.CoDAS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variability in swallowing electromyography (EMG) has been reported to occur due to individual differences, even in studies with appropriate control of factors affecting EMG such as food type, properties, and posture. The increased variability broadens the confidence intervals of measures obtained from EMG, such as time and amplitude, and makes it difficult to detect differences in muscle activity. This makes it impossible to detect slight changes in swallowing function at an early stage, which is required for clinical examination. In this study, we focused on the tipper type and dipper type of oral swallows, which differ in the timing of muscle activity. The frequency of occurrence of both types varies between participants, and both types could occur in the same participant. In this study, we measured swallowing EMG wherein participants were instructed to swallow with a tipper and a dipper. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the between-participant duration between these two types of swallows. Within-participant variability was significantly lower in the tipper-dipper instruction condition compared to the baseline condition, which assumed a mixture of tipper-dipper swallowing. These results demonstrate that instructions on swallowing method are effective in improving the reproducibility of EMG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35879527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.