Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879488›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2023

The cardiovascular challenges in giraffes.

Christian Aalkjær, Tobias Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lessons learned from comparative and extreme physiology.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian AalkjærDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. ca@biomed.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-4015
Tobias WangZoophysiology, Department of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giraffes are the highest living animals on Earth and therefore are challenged by gravity more than any other species. In particular the cardiovascular system needs to adapt to this challenge. Giraffes have a mean blood pressure around 200 mmHg, which ensures a mean arterial pressure near the head of 100 mmHg when the giraffe is standing with the neck in a near vertical position. This immediately raises several questions. How do giraffes avoid edema in the legs where the arterial pressure is 300 mmHg or higher? How does the heart produce a pressure of 200 mmHg, and what is the energy required for this endeavor? How can the kidney tolerate a pressure of about 200 mmHg and does this mean that giraffes have a high glomerular filtration rate? What is the arterial pressure in the head of giraffes when they drink, and how is perfusion of the brain maintained when they lift their head after drinking? In this short review, we present some answers to these questions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemGiraffesAnimalsCardiac outputCerebral perfusionEdemaRenal functionVascular structure

Identifiers

PMID35879488
OpenAlexW4287578566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.