Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879471›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Low prognostic nutritional index is associated with poor outcome in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Bo Wu, Ling-Qin Ni, Yong Wang, Hai-Hua Yang, Shan-Kun Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with endostar and concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bo WuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ling-Qin NiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hai-Hua YangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai, Zhejiang, China.
Shan-Kun ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China. zhaoshankun@tzc.edu.cn.
Taizhou Central Hospital · CNTaizhou University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

the Medical and Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province 2020RC040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic nutritional index (PNI) and age are effective prognostic factors for patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and an interaction between them may exist. However, the age cutoff value is generally set at 45 years in current studies. The clinical implications of PNI in middle-aged and elderly patients are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to uncover this issue. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively collected data from 132 middle-aged and elderly (≥ 45 years old) patients with non-metastatic NPC. The association between covariates and the PNI was analyzed using

resultsMedian age (61.0 years versus 59.5 years) and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years (57.6% versus 50.0%) in the low-PNI group were higher than those in the high-PNI group (P > 0.05). The patients with a low PNI had shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.93; P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; P = 0.034). The results remained stable after three adjusted models of covariates, including age (P < 0.05). No significant interactions were observed in middle-aged (45-59 years) and elderly (≥ 60 years) subgroups for OS and PFS (P for interaction > 0.05).

conclusionAlthough there is an interaction between PNI and age, PNI is an independent prognostic factor in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic NPC.

Indexed as

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNutrition AssessmentAgedHumansMiddle AgedNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAgeMiddle-aged and elderly patientsNasopharyngeal carcinomaOverall survivalPrognostic nutritional indexProgression free survival

Identifiers

PMID35879471
OpenAlexW4287510270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.