ArticleScientific reports2022
Finite element and in vitro study on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct or indirect composite restorations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanical behavior of endocrown vs. post-and-crown: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with different bi-layered core and occlusal overlay materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Stress distribution in Class I composite restorations with polyethylene fiber wallpapering under different occlusal loads: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- The Impact of the Orthodontic Forces on the Internal Resorptive Process for Intact Periodontium: A Finite Element Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Biomechanics of the tooth cervical region investigated using 3D digital image correlation, micro CT, and finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fracture strength and failure patterns of different restoration approaches in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an in vitro study with fractographic analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Orthodontically Induced External Root Resorption: A Finite Element Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Immature Permanent Incisors Following MTA Apexification with Different Coronal Base Materials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomechanical behavior of immediately placed implant using bone graft and socket shield techniques: a 3D finite element analysis.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of stress distribution in maxillary premolar restored with onlay fabricated with different restorative materials - A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Finite element analysis of occlusal stress in cervical dentin: effects of thickness and cross-section.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Stress Evaluation in Endodontically Treated Virtual Teeth Restored with Composite Fillings and Cast or Fiberglass Posts-A Finite Element Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Modified titanium post with polished sidewalls and prefabricated shoulders can effectively preserve the teeth with subgingival defects.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using the appropriate modulus of elasticity of periodontal ligament matters in stress analysis of human first premolar tooth and periodontium structures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Experimental characterization and finite element investigation of SiOScientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of a 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate-treated Bioceramic Sealer on the Bond Strength of an Endodontic Fiber Post: Multilayer Composite Disk Models and Ultra-highspeed Imaging Analysis.The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2024Article
- How loss of tooth structure impacts the biomechanical behavior of a single-rooted maxillary premolar: FEA.Odontology · 2024Article
- Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Tooth MOD Cavity Restored with Ribbon Fiber-Reinforced Composite (Wallpapering Technique) Using Finite Element Method.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2024Article
- Assessment of biomechanical behavior of immature non-vital incisors with various treatment modalities by means of three-dimensional quasi-static finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives of the study were to investigate biomechanical properties of severely compromised premolars restored with composite restorations using finite element analysis (FEA), and in vitro fracture resistance test. A 3-D model of an endodontically treated premolar was created in Solidworks. Different composite restorations were modelled (direct restoration-DR; endo-crown-EC; post, core, and crown-C) with two different supporting tissues: periodontal ligament/alveolar bone (B), and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Models were two-point axially loaded occlusally (850 N). Von Mises stresses and strains were calculated. The same groups were further tested for static fracture resistance in vitro (n = 5, 6.0 mm-diameter ball indenter, vertical load). Fracture resistance data were statistically analyzed (p < 0.050). The highest stresses and strains in all FEA models were observed on occlusal and vestibular cervical surfaces, corresponding to fracture propagation demonstrated in vitro. C showed the lowest stress in dentin, while EC showed lower stresses and strains in crown cement. B models demonstrated larger high stress areas in the root than PMMA models. No significant differences in fracture resistance (N) were observed between groups (DR: 747.7 ± 164.0, EC: 867.3 ± 108.1, C: 866.9 ± 126.3; p = 0.307). More conservative restorations seem a feasible alternative for endodontically treated premolars to conventional post-core-crown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.