Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879341›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

An inertial mechanism behind dynamic station holding by fish swinging in a vortex street.

Sam Tucker Harvey, Valentine Muhawenimana, Stephanie Müller, Catherine A M E Wilson, Petr Denissenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Swimming Behavior ofBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sam Tucker HarveyDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PJ, UK.
Valentine MuhawenimanaSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.
Stephanie MüllerSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.
Catherine A M E WilsonSchool of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK.
Petr DenissenkoSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. p.denissenko@warwick.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many aquatic and aerial animal species are known to utilise their surrounding flow field and/or the induced flow field of a neighbour to reduce their physical exertion, however, the mechanism by which such benefits are obtained has remained elusive. In this work, we investigate the swimming dynamics of rainbow trout in the wake of a thrust-producing oscillating hydrofoil. Despite the higher flow velocities in the inner region of the vortex street, some fish maintain position in this region, while exhibiting an altered swimming gait. Estimates of energy expenditure indicate a reduction in the propulsive cost when compared to regular swimming. By examining the accelerations of the fish, an explanation of the mechanism by which energy is harvested from the vortices is proposed. Similar to dynamic soaring employed by albatross, the mechanism can be linked to the non-equilibrium hydrodynamic forces produced when fish encounter the cross-flow velocity generated by the vortex street.

Indexed as

Oncorhynchus mykissSwimmingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHydrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID35879341
PMCPMC9314336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.