Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35879095›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2024

National longitudinal tobacco product cessation rates among US adults from the PATH Study: 2013-2019 (waves 1-5).

Karin A Kasza, Zhiqun Tang, Haijun Xiao, Daniela Marshall, Cassandra A Stanton, Amy L Gross, Kathy M Jackson, Dannielle Kelley, Megan J Schroeder, Juan C Vivar and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Urinary Tobacco and Nicotine Exposure Biomarkers as Predictors of Transitions between Cigarette and e-Cigarette Use in the Exhale Longitudinal Cohort Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karin A KaszaDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA karin.kasza@roswellpark.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-098X
Zhiqun TangBehavioral Health and Health Policy Practice, Westat Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-6503
Haijun XiaoCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Daniela MarshallNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cassandra A StantonBehavioral Health and Health Policy Practice, Westat Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-6261
Amy L GrossCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Kathy M JacksonCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Dannielle KelleyCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Megan J SchroederCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Juan C VivarCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Andrew HylandDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USWestat (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100027CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600001C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report on longitudinal tobacco product cessation rates, by product type, among adults (ages 18+ years) in the USA between 2013 and 2019.

methodsThe Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study was used to report on annual and biennial rates of the following three cessation behaviours across 2013-2019: (1) discontinuing tobacco product use (ie, transition from past 30-day use to no past 30-day use), (2) attempting to quit tobacco product use and (3) quitting tobacco product use among those who attempted to quit. Each cessation behaviour was evaluated separately for cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), cigars, hookah and smokeless tobacco. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate linear and nonlinear trends in cessation rates across the study period.

resultsBetween 2013 and 2019, rates of discontinuing cigarette smoking among adults in the USA statistically increased from 16% to 18%, though these were consistently lower than rates of discontinuing use of other tobacco products. Similarly, quit attempt rates and rates of quitting among attempters increased for cigarette smokers. However, rates of discontinuing ENDS use sharply declined across the study period, from 62% to 44%.

conclusionsFindings show that tobacco product cessation rates have been changing in recent years in the USA alongside the changing tobacco product marketplace and regulatory environment, though rates of discontinuing cigarette smoking remain relatively low. Findings can serve as a benchmark against which future cessation rates can be compared to evaluate the impacts of future tobacco regulatory policies.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use CessationTobacco Use DisorderAdultHumansLongitudinal StudiesUnited StatesCessationElectronic nicotine delivery devicesPublic policySurveillance and monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35879095
PMCPMC10249338
OpenAlexW4287578457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.